Richard,
I had a chance to listen to a pair of Vinnie's Sig 70's that he had sent up to Paul Candy from 6moons for a review. Paul had brought them along to our TAAS Amp Comparo that we held earlier this year. BTW, I thought they fared exceptionally well amidst some of the other great performers there.
Vinnie was kind enough to ask Paul to send them to me after he finished reviewing them, and I had them in my system for a couple of weeks.

I agree with you on a lot of the sonic qualities of the Sig 70's. They do have good bass extension, perhaps giving up the slightest wee bit of bottom end control to a good solid state amp (but really, I'm splitting hairs here). I also found them to be silky smooth, as you describe, and very good detail retrieval. Also not an overly forward sounding amp. Just laid back enough. Another aspect, is they are entirely non-fatiguing. The more you listen to them, the more you want to keep on listening. I could easily listen to this amp all day.
Interestingly, I found that with acoustically ambient recordings such as classical, and jazz in particular, I could hear the delay between early reflections of the hall the music was recorded in a tad clearer. The slap of the left/right early reflections, and late reflections was noticeably clearer, giving the overall stereo imaging an added sense of realism. I suspect that some of that might be due to the improved channel separation of the Sig 70's being mono-blocs. But in any event, it exists in the Sig 70's.
I also, at the same time as I had the Sig 70's, had a 300B based tube amp from Kallista Audio, and by comparison, the 300B was a slower amp, a little less defined in the bass, and a little rolled off in the highs. I still quite enjoyed that amp as well, a nice easy listening amp, but not my cup of tea.
I would agree with what a lot of people say about the Sig 70 having a good blend of characteristics of both a good SS amp and a good tube amp.
Congrats on hitting upon a combo that really rocks for you!
Cheers