0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 5379 times.
...and unbelievable stable at 200 wpc at 0.5ohm in stereo!
Maybe it has something to do with most things in that fall in the "first watt" zone.
I'm still trying to figure out if current is so great, why the little Trends and Sonic amps sound so good, even to fairly decent levels. Maybe it has something to do with most things in that fall in the "first watt" zone.
You can get an idea if an amp is truly high current by the power specs. Into 4 ohms it should be a minimum of 1.5 times more powerful. Being able to deliver more power as the impedance drops tells you it's a high current amp.
I'm listening to Tandberg 3012,that beatiful int. grips my speakers like any number of amps could only dream of...
Basically, Roger Sanders has designed this amplifier to handle the very demanding and taxing loads that electrostatic speakers place on them (as low as 2 ohms) and consequently work extremely well with the less demanding loads of more conventional magnetic speakers.If I can sum up his philosophy in a nutshell it would be that adequate, clean power is required to truly convey all the musical information through your system by eliminating the harsh effects of clipping and that this should not come at the cost of a new car! He does this by providing a massive output stage. Says Roger, "Each output transistor is capable of delivering 250 watts-and there are eighteen of these per channel. As a result, it could deliver a staggering 135 amps of current with a combined power rating of 4,500 watts per channel." I called Roger to clarify this statement. He said that one would need a power supply four times the size of the amp to truly produce this amount of power. The reason for using this number of output transistors was to provide a very large safety factor without the use of protection circuitry, which could have deleterious affects on the sound quality. All of this is done to produce music, effortlessly, clearly and accurately without that "transistor-sound."