0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 6352 times.
Quote from: hotbird on 6 Apr 2007, 02:34 amProof of the pudding is in the eating.Go try it instead of being an armchair criticSure. Soon as you can tell me what my listening to it has to do with anything I've said.But let's say I did listen to it. And that I didn't hear any difference at all. Would this then prove that it doesn't work?se
Proof of the pudding is in the eating.Go try it instead of being an armchair critic
Quote from: hotbird on 6 Apr 2007, 12:35 amAcoustic Revive tweaks do work. You just have to set down your prejudices and arroganceto try them out.So would you be willing to try the frozen photograph tweak? It would cost you virtually nothing.Here's the "problem":Each individual human had a fundamental adverse problem imposed on their senses when they had their first photograph taken. A photographic image captures the unique identity of the subject of the photograph but imposes a significant temporal (time) asymmetrical pattern. The action of this photograph radically changed the inner symmetry of the senses of the photographed human being. Fortunately, this debilitating adverse condition is reversible.Here is the "cure":To restore a significant temporal (time) symmetry to any person's senses, it is necessary to acquire one photograph which was exposed when the person was young and another photograph exposed when the person was older. Each photograph is placed, individually, into it's own clear plastic bag. The two plastic bags, each containing a spaced time photograph of the same individual, should be placed inside the freezer compartment of the domestic refrigerator.And here's the "explanation":This experiment demonstrates that within the freezer compartment, there exists a high degree of symmetry and that this symmetrical condition is imposed on the temporal asymmetric condition of the two chronologically spaced photographs and is, in turn, imposed on the senses of the human subject of the photographs. It is unfortunate that the vast majority of people, including many who work in science and technology, do not appreciate that a photograph functions within the quantum mechanical world.And here's an excerpt from a legitimate audio review by Carol Clark in Positive Feedback magazine:I have my photos in the freezer, and it has not only improved my enjoyment of music at home, but at fellow audiophiles homes nearby, and as far away as Las Vegas during this year’s CES.QuoteJapan do make many high end audiophile products, whose qualityand performance are right now being revered by many in US now, eg Esoteric, Airtight,Accuphase, Shindo etc, you don't call them bs brands do you ? Are any of those brands making ridiculous claims similar to those made by Acoustic Revive?se
Acoustic Revive tweaks do work. You just have to set down your prejudices and arroganceto try them out.
Japan do make many high end audiophile products, whose qualityand performance are right now being revered by many in US now, eg Esoteric, Airtight,Accuphase, Shindo etc, you don't call them bs brands do you ?
Does something that costs $450 qualify as a tweak? Hotbird, Are you connected to Audio Revive? You sure seem to know a lot about what's happening with their products.
Hotbird--You behave as if you have something invested. I've never noticed you until this topic arose. Now every other post is from you. And you are using the typical shill language, calling people arrogant and belittling their skepticism. Why? What motivates your interest?
Listen first, then debunk.Simple as that... aaA suspect is not guilty until proven aa
Why bother, I have tried the acoustic revive, and they work.
So what does the experiment below prove anything to me?
The "grounding" improvement may be duplicated by measuring the voltage potential on the outside of the chassis with respect to ground with a voltmeter and reversing the wall plug polarity to achieve the lowest voltage.
there is this Chinese saying "There is always a mountain higher than any mountain"
Quote from: hotbird on 6 Apr 2007, 12:43 am there is this Chinese saying "There is always a mountain higher than any mountain" ... and there is this American saying "Ain't no mountain high enough"
Quote from: hotbird on 6 Apr 2007, 03:16 amListen first, then debunk.Simple as that... aaA suspect is not guilty until proven aa What I have addressed is the ridiculous claims made in their "explanation." My listening to them doesn't make those claims any less ridiculous.If I claim my cables are made of pixie dust, would someone first have to listen to them before pointing out that my pixie dust claim is ridiculous? Again, I don't see what listening has to do with anything I've said.se
Frankly I have not even heard about your cables and seeing the way you present yourself,I am not even interested now.
Quote from: hotbird on 6 Apr 2007, 03:19 amWhy bother, I have tried the acoustic revive, and they work.Because it's said to improve your listening experience. Are you not interested in improving your listening experience? QuoteSo what does the experiment below prove anything to me?To see if the photographs in the freezer improves your listening experience. Or again, are you not interested in improving your listening experience?se
Quote from: hotbird on 6 Apr 2007, 06:29 amFrankly I have not even heard about your cables and seeing the way you present yourself,I am not even interested now. Uh, so?se
Oh yeah, citing a ridiculous experiment to prove you are smarter
Quote from: hotbird on 6 Apr 2007, 06:31 amOh yeah, citing a ridiculous experiment to prove you are smarter Why is it ridiculous? And why can you call this ridiculous without having tried it but I can't call Acoustic Revive's claims about the RGC-24 ridiculous without having tried tried it?se
Have more humility in your reply... guess it will never sink in
