Paul,
In retrospect I probably should have just let this one go. Since I wasn't part of the actual exchanges I can only report what my friend told me. As I said, I'm sure the sonics, and probably all else as well, are top notch and one incident, even as serious as it is, is no meter for the company as a whole.
That said, for my purposes the Modwright, the AVA, and even possibly the Odyssey Candela may be just what I need.
I again want to stress that this is a matter of personal tastes and I'm sure many will be more than happy with the Signature 70s on their own -- though I will say that most of the people who tried a tube pre in front of their RWA Signature amps have very different kinds of speakers being driven by them. Which is to say, aside from the issues of longer cabling in an all-passive system, and the convenience factor (alright, that is part of the issue, but to my mind nothing to compromise sonics over), I had no complaints when I was using my amps with single driver, crossoverless speakers. I want extra punch in the bottom end, more body in the mids, and to regain that elusive holographic quality that for some reason unknown to me, I can only really get with tubes in the system, and I feel pretty confident that most of this is the result of having much less efficient speakers with a very complex, albit beautifully designed and implemented, crossover in it.
I have always liked the combination of a tube front end and SS power amplification, and like Mike, the one time I had a tube pre in front of my Clari-T (even though the speakers were Abbys) it just added an extra dimension to the music, which to my ears is the sound I most prefer. Ok, not an entirely fair comparison as the Clari-T, as nice as it was, just isn't in the same league as the Signature amps, but the basic point still stands.
I just like that tube, "je ne sais quoi" -- when it is well done, and that's me, and it's not going to change.
-- Jim