I was checking those out at your web site earlier this week. Nice.
The key questions that I came away with were...
How do they affix to the wall? Do you end up with a flush-mounted installation? I suppose that the add'l pictures that you mentioned will certainly show this in detail.
What happens to image and soundstage vs. stand-mounted Emeralds?
I see that you've mentioned "adjusting the tuning to take advantage of on-wall placement"... what does that mean? Is this just a reference to bass rein ...
Jack:
Good questions! As to the wall mounting: On the rear is a metal plate with two keyways. Drawing looks like:
http://www.audioc.com/speakers/Images/Emerald%20on%20wall%20bracket%203%20solid.JPGWith the proper screws into studs, you could practically hang from these things:) The mounting is not completely flush. There are 1/4" rubber pads at the four rear corners. By adjusting the tension on the two screws, you get a very snug, tight, and rattle free attachment.
Image is very similar to the stand mounted Emeralds. The big difference is that you don't get as much depth. To get the best depth of soundfield you need the time delay that out in the room placement gives you. This is true of ALL on or in-wall speakers. The amount of depth you will still hear is dependent on the recording. Now, if used in a multi-channel system, much of the depth comes from the use of the surrounds. A 5.1 or 7.1 multichannel system with these speakers will sound very good indeed!
The crossover is not changed from the standard Emerald. The porting is changed just a bit. One of the guys has the response graphs on another computer. I'll see if I can reach him and he can forward me the graphs so I can better explain the difference in the low-frequency response.
Thanks for asking great questions!