Children of Men

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic. Read 4492 times.

Wind Chaser

Re: Children of Men
« Reply #20 on: 16 Feb 2007, 12:18 am »
There were times during the film I felt marginally interested but overall it was a let down.  It tries to be serious via the tone but makes no attempt to explain the implausibility of the subject matter or the why and wherewithal.

Toka

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 845
Re: Children of Men
« Reply #21 on: 15 Nov 2007, 01:14 am »
There were times during the film I felt marginally interested but overall it was a let down.  It tries to be serious via the tone but makes no attempt to explain the implausibility of the subject matter or the why and wherewithal.

I've heard that complaint about the film more than any other negative (well, beyond the laughable, dim-witted assertion that it is somehow leftist propaganda), but I don't think it is a negative at all. Why? It doesn't matter. Implausibility is debatable, but from a narrative standpoint, it is irrelevant. If Theo (keep in mind everything that the viewer "knows" is what he knows) knew what caused the lack of birth, the story (again, from his viewpoint) would not change.

Hicks

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 136
  • Aperion Audio
    • Aperion Audio
Re: Children of Men
« Reply #22 on: 16 Nov 2007, 05:32 pm »
Excellent movie, probably one of the best I've seen in the last five years. 

The urban warfare scene at the end with the super long shot was probably the best executed scene of its type since Saving Private Ryan.

The Pink Floyd Animals reference was a nice touch too.

JoshK

Re: Children of Men
« Reply #23 on: 7 Dec 2007, 12:22 am »
I liked it and wondered what all the ho-hum reviews were all about.  There are plenty of other dissapointing movies out there to skip over for this one. 

slow_down

Re: Children of Men
« Reply #24 on: 7 Dec 2007, 01:24 am »
The movie actually has three longer tracking shots.  The first one is in the beginning, and if you don't think about cinematography in movies while watching them, you could easily miss it - which is fine.  The cinematographer for the film has said more or less the point of the longer shots isn't to "show off" but rather to involve you in a scene in a deeper way.  Having a seemingly uninterrupted shot draws you deeper in.  The second long shot is during the car ride in the middle of the film, and is, in my opinion, terrifyingly effective.  Then of course there's the urban battle at the end which is pretty awesome.

Chldren of men is already being studied in film schools and will have a legacy way larger than its original commercial life.

Incidentally, one of my favorite things about this film is that there is so little exposition - there are a few lines of dialogue here and there, but so much of what you need to know about the world in which this story is set is to be found in the background, on TV commercials in somebody's apartment, a newspaper clipping on a wall, city scenery during a car ride.  In a science fiction movie exposition is pretty much the hardest thing a screenwriter has to do deal with - there's too much to explain! - so the fact that they so seamlessly weave it into the story and setting is truly impressive.

If you haven't guessed by now, I really like this movie.