I have a basic question that I know the folks here can answer. There are different options to running cables when setting up a bi-amped / tri-amped system when doing this passively, as one would do with an OXO RM-40, or the future V-60. I was wondering if one way was sonically superior to the others. I realize that some methods would be more practical and economic, but that is not my question. Lets first assume that the preamp just has a single set of output jacks and is located 15' away from the power amps, which are closer to the speakers. Also, would it make a difference on questions #1 and #2 if the preamp was closer to the power amps?
1) Is it better to split the signal at the preamp and run two (or three) interconnects to each of the power amps, or run single interconnects from the preamp and then split at the end of the run, at the power amps?
2) Can you daisy-chain the connection? That is run to one power amp and spit the signal at its input, then run to a second, a third etc? Will you run into timing issues when doing something like this? This leads to the next scenario.
Lets say we are using twin subwoofers with built in PBS requiring an interconnect to run directly to them. The rest of the power amps for that bi / tri-amped system are located close to the preamp. Does it make a difference that one set of amps will have very long interconnects and use very short speaker cables, while the other amps will do the opposite, having very short interconnects and very long speaker cables. Are there timing (phase) issues involved here, or would they be so small as not to matter?