I am leaning towards the Vandersteens. I got a chance to listen to them yesterday and liked what I heard. My only concern is that with the large amount of cloth on them they could be a "target" for our two cats. I haven't been able to locate any Revels or Von Schweikerts to audition. So, can anyone give me some idea of the sound of those two speakers compared to the Vandersteens?
I have nothing against Vandersteen speakers (they still offer excellent value) and I have a lot of respect for Richard Vandersteen. Since the volume of your room is large, I suggest that you consider adding a subwoofer at some point to give you some additional weight. Due to Vandersteen's use of first order crossovers, Richard strongly suggests using two of his subs rather than just one. When I spoke to him several years ago, he suggested don;t even bother buying any until you can afford two.
When I auditioned the Vandy 2Ce I was using Meadowlark Kestrel Hot Rods (like Vandy also time/phase coherent). I found the Vandy's bass to be quite boomy and slow. I ended up buying a pair of Spendor S8e instead; yes, they cost 2X as much as either the 2Ce or the Kestrels.
I have not heard the Revel, but I would choose it over the Vandy for these reasons: 1) adding a single sub is acceptable, 2) Stereophile review and measurements
http://stereophile.com/floorloudspeakers/706revel/ and 3) Revel has two of the best speaker designers on the planet - Floyd Toole and Kevin Voecks plus research resources.
Here's how JA concludes his measurements -
Overall, the Revel Concerta F12's excellent measured performance gives no hint of the speaker's very affordable price. It raises the bar for what should be expected from a design in this very competitive price region.
Other speakers that come to mind are the Spendor S5e and Paradigm Studio 60.
-- Bob