Chazz, Victor, Icefox and myself had a fun gathering on Saturday at Chazz’s nice apartment.
Jay, we missed you, your eAR Two and Mensa DIO!
Equipment used:
- B&W Nautilus 805
- Pre-amps (Opera/Consonance Reference 1.1 tube pre, FT Audio LW1 passive)
- Digital (Teac T1 cdp (transport), Monarchy DIP, Smart DIO)
- Cables (Van den Hul CS3?? Hybrid speaker cable, Bolder M80, SlinkyLinks speaker cable and IC, Mogami IC, unterminated solid core speaker cable)
- Room treatment (Eighth Nerve Room Pack and extra seams)
- Amps (Odyssey Stratos Monoblocks (not Xtreme version), Rowland Design Model 10)
Chazz’s systemWe started off acclimatizing ourselves with the sound of Chazz’s system by running through a varied musical programme ranging from Korean new-age vocals, acoustic instrumentals, Eminem, spatial sound effects, classical works, Silje Nergaard and the King’s Singers. Chazz has the
N805’s about 3.5’- 4’ from the rear wall and about 5’ from the listening position, so relatively near field. Chazz, please correct me if my estimate is off! Chazz has his
Opera Ref tube pre on an SSC (string suspension) base. I was really looking forward to hearing the
Odyssey monos, having read so much about them on HD and AC. They are large and built like tanks.
We agreed that the N805’s sounded very detailed top to bottom, dynamic and controlled. So the Odysseys were definitely asserting their authority over the N805s in a take-hold-of-your-shirt-front-and-shake way!
However the music seemed a bit dissected with the treble, mids and bass doing their own thing and not quite gelling together as a musical whole. The sound didn’t flow too well either and the presentation was a little on the bright and lean side. There was also a slight bass boom that Chazz and Victor noticed.
Cables To try to address these imbalances, we first swapped out the
Bolder M80 with a
Mogami IC between pre and the Odyssey Mono’s. This made the sound a little rolled off at the top and bottom and not as lively. So back went the M80. We then swapped in the
SlinkyLink (SL) IC between sMART DIO and pre (keeping the M80 between pre and amps) and this gave us the best balance of liveliness, detail and smoothness. The musical parts started coming together and flow better.
Then we decided to try the SL speaker cables but since they are not a bi-wire pair, we had to wrestle and contort some Empirical Audio jumpers into the (*@!#) CE approved plastic shrouded terminals of the N805s before we could use them. The SL cable cleaned up the sound quite a bit. Transients sounded crisper, bass was tighter and best of all the system sounded more coherent and musical.
AmpsAfter satisfying ourselves that the cables are working well with the system, we powered down the Odysseys and replaced them with the
Rowland Model 10. The Rowland is certainly a beautiful piece of audio hardware. Chazz’s Odyssey monos are also nicely built with a stylish chrome (platinum?) front plate, but the Rowland is almost industrial art in a slim package. It came with a huge garden hose of an umbilical cord to connect the amp output section with the switch-mode power supply. The Rowland also sports an unusual 20A IEC with rectangular pins, so no power cord swapping unless the plugs are the right sort.
Our first cut was Eminem and in retrospect, that was probably a mistake. The Rowland immediately sounded hard, bright and very in-yer-face (maybe that was the point!) - all symptoms of a cold and/or unbroken in amp. Turns out it was both. Victor told us that his amp is only a month old. And after about half an hour, the amp sounded much better. Make no mistake, the Rowland is a super detailed and very transparent amp but, as with any hi-rez electronics, one that needs quite a bit of careful matching to bring out its best traits. I’m not sure that the N805’s are the best partner for the Rowland due to the hyper vivid nature of the Nautilus tweeter and less than pristine recordings.
Rowland vs OdysseyBearing in mind that the Odyssey monos were pretty much broken-in after 6 months use and the Rowlands are hardly run in, I would still venture that the Rowland pips the Odyssey for detail and sheer transparency especially with the FT Audio passive. The Rowland seems to prefer an active linestage to get more drive. Silje sounded stunning with the Rowland/FT Audio combo but a jazz instrumental cut (something from the Naim label) sounded a little flat. Of course Eminem sounded just as much in-yer-face with either active or passive linestage …
However both amps are fast, have very extended bass, open and engaging mids and superb clarity in the highs. Of the two, the Rowland has a relatively more forward presentation. However, in terms of sheer listenability, I’d give the Odysseys the nod. Ask me again in another couple of months though once the Rowland runs in…
Quantum Symphony ProI brought it and it did what it usually does…I’ll let the others chime in with their impressions
All in all I had a great time and it was very nice meeting Chazz and Victor. Many thanks to Chazz for his kind hospitality in hosting this meeting of HAMS. We had plenty of snacks and orange juice!
Guys, feel free to chime in with your own thoughts. I must have missed out tons of stuff….