Guys,
Some comments.
Spirit, Bunky, there should never be a problem asking any question whatsoever///as long as there are no insults, of course.
As for break-in, you all know my position. The changes in our and SL's amps are simply brutal, and unfortunately it takes a very, very long time, both signal and just physically. There are no established thesis' in regards as to why this happens at all. I am with the idea that next to fully charging components, all of the magzillions of electrons need time to "form a river bed". That's why breaking in directional components make sense.
As for Frank's position, let me just say that I have lots and lots of respect for him, both as a person, and as a designer, and actually had a 550 of his. Even though his amp is very different from ours, I like it// a lot. However, I do completely disagree with his position on break-in etc. Again, different schools of philosophy.
How does our stuff change, and why can it differ?
Very simple. Each system , environment, and experience is organic and individual. Different tastes, different listening behavior, attention given, resolution of systems, software, you name it. The same identical amp goes through exactly the same process, but one person hears much more than the other. Of course.
As for the notion that the amps don't change, but you only get used to it: absolute crap. Other companies make sure that their gear is running full time at least a month before a show. Why?
I have actually done the experiment several times, and even demonstrated it in my home twice for visiting customers:
Took a brand new Stratos, idebtical to one of the units in my system, identical up to the mV in biasing, (which I showed the people), and put them side by side. Well, think in terms of the Nurburgring, first driving a nice Porsche Turbo, and then getting into a an old beetle. Getting used to ? Don't say that this can also play a part, of course, but the proof is in the pudding.
BTW, as for anybody trying to do any comparisons, here is a bit of tidbits:
1. never do any serious listening within 2 hours after eating. The digestive process takes a huge toll on your listening ability.
2. Sounds stupid, but really true: always clean out your ears well. (now, go to bed kids, hehehe)
3. There is no listener memory. What you heard can stay maybe 10 seconds with you. Other than the ususal factors of SPL matching, sitting positions, etc., it is impossible to say with absolute certainty as to what differences you really heard after 10 seconds. Of course you have an idea, and that brings me to my mantra, which I repeat over and over to my customers: LISTEN WITH YOUR GUT FEELING and with your HAIR ON YOUR NECK. Who gives a crap about a foot in depth here or a note there. It's all about "this is right"
So, when listening to a new and a broken in amp of ours side by side, we could go into those meaningless
audiophile terms, which is nonsense anyway, see above, but other than perceived obvious differences even
after 10 seconds, the difference in one being very right and the other one not there yet is overwhelming.
4. Don't try to pick up changes from a "lesser" to a " better" component, but the other way around. If you try to get any impressions somewhat right, (notwithstanding the 10 seconds or emotions), and you just have to try to get "differences" defined, then it is much easier for our ears and brains to notice what is missing rather than what is added.
Ultimately, I don't see why there should be a single electronic component that doesn't need break-in. They all use cables, electronic components, solder, etc. That just doesn't make sense to me.
However, I think I have always been on the forefront of being upfront and honest about the long time of real break-in. Believe me, I wish I wouldn't at times. For marketing , it is a nightmare.
"Dear Customer, congrats to your new amp, but guess what? It takes 1-3 months to sound at its best".
Late,
Klaus