Anybody NOT own a televison set?

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 4815 times.

Rob Babcock

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 9322
Re: Anybody NOT own a televison set?
« Reply #40 on: 11 Sep 2006, 03:20 am »
Since I have the projector, I'm elected to do the Super Bowl thing.

Christof

Re: Anybody NOT own a televison set?
« Reply #41 on: 12 Sep 2006, 01:47 am »
Projector only in my place and it only plays movies.  It's been about 12 years since I've had any sort of 'network television' in my home.  God awful plague, that box is, if you ask me.

HumanMedia

Re: Anybody NOT own a televison set?
« Reply #42 on: 12 Sep 2006, 03:33 am »
TV is unplugged in the corner of the room.  I have a projector and only watch DVDs.  I tried a set top box for widescreen digital TV, but the content was so bad that I returned the box and have never dipped into TV again.   TV is like a fake reality for the lowest common denominator of human.  I stay away and my life is better for it.

jules

Re: Anybody NOT own a televison set?
« Reply #43 on: 12 Sep 2006, 07:04 am »
I'm surprised ... the responses here might not be typical but TV seems to get a fairly low rating overall.

Mine is "in the corner" too and while I've been a keen viewer in the past, I think I lost it at about the time I was supposed to get into pay TV.

For the cost of a couple of years subscription it's possible to make a trip to another part of the world for maybe a month if you choose [no, not Italy or somehwere expensive  :)]. So which would make more impression on your life and what would you remember in ten years time? A few episodes of some entertainment natural history show or the real thing?

For news and international information I listen to our national broadcaster the ABC. It might not be perfect but it dares to deal with all manner of topics that commercial TV wouldn't touch with a barge pole for various, not particularly admirable, reasons.

jules


arthur

Re: Anybody NOT own a televison set?
« Reply #44 on: 12 Sep 2006, 09:47 am »
Haven’t owned a TV since 1995… oh, wait I think I had one in my closet for a few years but got rid of it. But I do end up watching TV about an hour every week when visiting people.

I have several reasons for liberating myself from the boxed opiate:

1) it would ruin the imaging between the speakers. Instead I use a projector with a pull down screen when I want to watch a DVD. (well actually much of this got damaged in a fire, but I’m slowly rebuilding… I just wish cd’s were fire proof  :?)

2) even with 500 channels there is usually nothing interesting to watch – and the more channels you have the more time you end up spending flipping through channels to find anything… and by the time you come around to where you’ve started, there are all new programs on that you are now tempted to flip through to see if these are any good = waste of the short time that I have to spend in this world.

3) even when I do find something on an interesting topic, I end up feeling hollow after wasting a hour watching because all that the program gives you is some random information. Not that I mind random information – yes I am interested in Greek mythology and what not, but the problem with TV is that they frame everything within a lowest common denominator perspective (to capture the greatest # of viewers) . Consequently, it forces me to conceptualize and think of the given information in the stupid common denominator mode in order for me to keep up with the program, thereby pounding me down and keeping me at that level. Yes I am arguing that it diminishes our thinking capabilities. Maybe that’s why I feel so hollow afterwards – I feel dumber because it encouraged me to become dumber for at least the period of the time that I watched it.

4) you know how when you just look at someone’s face and mannerisms you get a sense of what kind of a person you are dealing with; well just about all of the people that appear on TV, when I try to visualize them in real life I come to a conclusion that I would not trust them to clean my toaster, never mind having them shape my notion of reality.

4) I rather live it than watch it.

nathanm

Re: Anybody NOT own a televison set?
« Reply #45 on: 12 Sep 2006, 03:42 pm »
One of my favorite courses in college was a television class which was held at a local station.  You got a chance to work just about every aspect of producing a TV news show.  Run camera, run sound, be the floor director, run teleprompters, work the switcher and such.  It was really enlightening to see what goes on behind the scenes of what you see on TV.  It struck me just what a huge bit of show business it is and how canned and phony the whole thing is.  Granted it's was a much smaller scale imitation of the real thing, but it still shows just how easily you can manipulate something.  You can spin something any way you want with editing.  People formulate their opinions of grand events through this tiny lens of TV but once you know that there's way more there that they aren't showing you it becomes a little frustrating to watch.  I thought it would be a great course for anyone to take even if they have no interest in the field because just about everybody watches the thing but few know how it works.

Not 100% sure this applies here, but what the hey. Arthur's 3rd point comments sort of reminded me.  The "Wisdom Defecit":
http://dancarlin.libsyn.com/media/dancarlin/cswdca47.mp3

100% sure this one applies! :lol:
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/38776

eric the red

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1738
Re: Anybody NOT own a televison set?
« Reply #46 on: 12 Sep 2006, 04:18 pm »
Regarding Arthur's comments and to paraphrase a quote from HD member PJ:
"I actually felt as though my IQ had dropped from watching that waste of a show" :wink:

Canyoneagle

Re: Anybody NOT own a televison set?
« Reply #47 on: 13 Sep 2006, 08:11 pm »
Like many of the others on this thread, I've been without a TV since about 1995.  My wife, son and I watch DVD's on the Mac right now, and we're contemplating a movie-only projector.
I haven't missed the TV one bit, and frankly can't stand to be in the room where one is present (and on).

Best,
Michael