Pioneer Elite EX-500 mic question

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 1491 times.

DS-21

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 334
Pioneer Elite EX-500 mic question
« on: 22 Jul 2006, 06:20 pm »
Would one of the people who has this receiver tell me what the model number of the mic is? I recently bought one only to find out that "complete with all accessories" doesn't mean that it includes the microphone. So I need to order one from Pioneer, assuming that their calibration/EQ routine is standardized around the mics they supply.

Otis

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 70
Re: Pioneer Elite EX-500 mic question
« Reply #1 on: 24 Jul 2006, 02:08 pm »
I looked at my mic and didn't see a model number on it. Does the owners' manual give a number?

Besides, if you're going to order from Pioneer anyway, why wouldn't they know which one it is?

DS-21

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 334
Re: Pioneer Elite EX-500 mic question
« Reply #2 on: 24 Jul 2006, 07:48 pm »
Thanks for looking!

One would hope Pioneer would know, but alas, neither the EX-500 set nor the VSX-C50 (which, from my research, appears to be the receiver's model number) show in their systems.

As for the manual, I don't have it yet. I looked online, and the manual for the EU-market VSX-C502 (which I think is the same receiver) does not list a model number for the mic, either.

Otis

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 70
Re: Pioneer Elite EX-500 mic question
« Reply #3 on: 25 Jul 2006, 07:24 pm »
DS-21, check the Pioneer.ca site, it lists the EX-50. Do you suppose that means that the system was technically meant for the Canadian market and not intended to be sold in the U.S?

BTW, the model numbers for the individual pieces are DV-50A for the universal player (apparently a re-badged DV-563) and VSX-50 for the receiver.

I took my own advice and looked for a model number for the mic in the owners' manual, and found nothing, sorry. I hope Pioneer can help you out.

Otis

UPDATE: I just noticed that on the back of the owners' man there's a U.S. customer service number that you can call for parts, accessories and so on.

800-421-1404

Good luck!

DS-21

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 334
Re: Pioneer Elite EX-500 mic question
« Reply #4 on: 26 Jul 2006, 02:18 am »
Turns out this thread was much ado about nothing. I received the EX500 today, The seller just didn't know what was in the box, or didn't equate "little black fried egg looking thing" to "microphone." So nothing needs to be ordered or even stressed out about after all.

I'm pretty impressed with MCAAC overall. It got distances and level-matching spot-on. The EQ didn't do much, but then I designed the crossovers specifically for this room and the speakers' current placement and there's basically nothing wrong with them for it to correct, so that's to be expected. It correctly identified my main speakers - 12" Tannoy dual concentrics in sealed enclosures with an F3 of around 80Hz - as "small." The only thing I had to override was its sub crossover, which it set to 200Hz even though my sub (Peerless XLS12 and XLS passive radiator powered by a 250W plate amp) is behind me. Admittedly, on a more complicated setup - I'm using it in my home office, which is 2.1-channel - there's more to screw up.

About the EX500/VSX-50 I have not much to say. I tested the DVD player to make sure the optical/coax/5.1 inputs work, but I'll probably end up selling it. With an iMac in the room I don't need it, and the Samsung universal player in my main system looks more impressive than the EX-500 one, even though the Pio calls itself "Elite." The VSX-50 is the first piece of audio gear I've bought since age 11 that used spring clips to connect the speakers, so I had to take the bananas off of my speaker wires and replace them with pin connectors that came with my surround sound wires. But they work fine, strictly speaking, even if they look cheap and feel crude.But they work fine, strictly speaking, even if they look cheap and feel crude. I connected to my iMac using Rat Shack's brilliant universal optical cable, which has ends that rotate to reveal either a standard Toslink or a headphone minijack-sized/shaped digital audio plug like the digital outputs Apple hides in most of their current equipment. The interface is decent enough, and I'm glad one doesn't need an on-screen display to set it up. It is slightly noisier than the Panasonic XR55 in my main system, and on a quick listen over there seems to have less power. It has plenty of power reserves for this system, though with 94dB/w/m speakers sitting about 7 feet from my ears there's little that wouldn't! But in terms of form factor and self-noise, it's a step up from the analog separates I had been using. Thanks mostly to bypassing the iMac's DAC and subpar analog output stage, I would think.