Anti-cables vs CC89259

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 2135 times.

BobM

Anti-cables vs CC89259
« on: 6 Jul 2006, 04:50 pm »
I've been a user of the CC89259 for many years now. But recently a lot of fellow audio club members have been replacing their expensive speaker cables with these "Anti-cables"

www.anticables.com

Has anyone had any direct experience comparing these against the CC89259? I know they are inexpensive enough to just try out for myself, but I am still wondering if anyone's had any experience with them and what your thoughts are.

Thanks,
Bob

thayerg

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 132
Re: Anti-cables vs CC89259
« Reply #1 on: 6 Jul 2006, 06:04 pm »
You can make your own anti-cables, save a ton of money, and get to choose the wire gage to boot, by buying what's called 'magnet wire' in bulk. Cut to length, strip the lacquer from the ends (surprisingly difficult), crimp some spade connectors on the ends and welcome to one of the best-kept secrets in audio. Great stuff. the only downside is that the stuff is so damn stiff it's hard to position.

smargo

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 555
Re: Anti-cables vs CC89259
« Reply #2 on: 6 Jul 2006, 06:13 pm »
Quote
Has anyone had any direct experience comparing these against the CC89259? I know they are inexpensive enough to just try out for myself, but I am still wondering if anyone's had any experience with them and what your thoughts are.

Thanks,
Bob

Yes i have both the speaker cables and the interconnect for at least 3 - 4 months and both are very good. really transparent and uncolered - i am using these exclusively, everything i try in $100 to $350 range doesn't hols up i keep coming back to the anticables and interconnect.

thanks,
smargo

brj

Re: Anti-cables vs CC89259
« Reply #3 on: 6 Jul 2006, 07:36 pm »
You can make your own anti-cables, save a ton of money, and get to choose the wire gage to boot, by buying what's called 'magnet wire' in bulk.
I believe that the anti-cables are using UP-OCC (Ohno continuous cast) magnet wire, which is a bit harder to find than standard magnet wire, especially in the larger gauges.


strip the lacquer from the ends (surprisingly difficult)
I haven't tried it, but I've seen people recommend burning it off with a lighter.

Folsom

Re: Anti-cables vs CC89259
« Reply #4 on: 11 Jul 2006, 05:32 am »
Just make some silver IC's with some good ends, beat both up that way.

Bill Baker

  • Industry Participant
  • Posts: 4921
  • Musica Bella Audio- Custom Design and Manufacturi
    • Musica Bella Audio
Re: Anti-cables vs CC89259
« Reply #5 on: 11 Jul 2006, 02:30 pm »
 I have been playing with the Anti-Cable for some time now and as time allows, I want to wire up the Usher D2 bass modules with the speaker cable.

 I also have a brand new 1M interconnect with Eichmanns that I have not even opened yet. If anybody is interested in it, I would let it go for $140 including shipping.

 The speaker cable is quite nice for the price. I have run it within quite a few nice systems with very promising results. I have 100 feet here that I still have to prep for use.

 I also have a few pairs of the Zero-formers that really come in handy when driving 4 ohm speakers with an amp that cannot handle the load.

 All-in-all, I feel Paul is offering quality products at a reasonable price. I like his stuff.

Bill Baker

  • Industry Participant
  • Posts: 4921
  • Musica Bella Audio- Custom Design and Manufacturi
    • Musica Bella Audio
Re: Anti-cables vs CC89259
« Reply #6 on: 11 Jul 2006, 02:31 pm »
 By the way BobM, love that Avatar :lol:

leahy582000

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 8
Re: Anti-cables vs CC89259
« Reply #7 on: 16 Jul 2006, 06:59 am »
You can make your own anti-cables, save a ton of money, and get to choose the wire gage to boot, by buying what's called 'magnet wire' in bulk.
I believe that the anti-cables are using UP-OCC (Ohno continuous cast) magnet wire, which is a bit harder to find than standard magnet wire, especially in the larger gauges.


strip the lacquer from the ends (surprisingly difficult)
I haven't tried it, but I've seen people recommend burning it off with a lighter.

hi,
for removing the red finish on the wire, i used some coarser sandpaper and it did the trick. i needed to use some of the wire to ground all my components as to eliminate the ground loop that is caused by the interconnect wires. all you do if members do not know, is this. make sure all the wire is the same length. i make sure its long enough to hang to the floor.( 12 awg wire like paul's is great ).use a connector that will slide over one of the metal screws on each component. i had some of PAUL'S speaker wire with spades and just crimped them together to fit over each screw on each component and tightened down. i then took the other end of the wire and clipped off the other speaker spade and used sandpaper to take off the red finish ( about 2-2.5 inches ). i then twisted all the wires together and wrapped it with some electrical tape. i then used a large enough wire nut connector that electricians use to finish twisting the wires together. it comes in many colors. you are finished. what you have now is no ground loop running continous between each component. the ground is were all the noise is. this is why grounding posts were put on preamps with  phono stages to connect to the record player. with analog you could hear this noise, it came as hum. with digital, its  different, its noise that you cannot hear like hum. its there and effects the sound, so you have to do the same thing that was done to prevent this with the preamp phono stage and the record player. the grounding scheme i mentioned above is the easiest way to assure that you are eliminating that continous ground loop. it should result in a quieter system. you are taking what eliminated the noise in a specific component like the record player and doing it to all the components. in my opinion, all components should have the same metal posts to make this type of grounding easier instead of using a metal screw somewhere on the chasis. the good news i guess is that it works without these metal posts.

i also use paul's speaker wire. one thing that i do is use a equal run of about 22-28 awg silver wire together with it. the silver helps eliminate some grunge at the top end and creates a larger, deeper soundstage, a sweeter top end, as well as helping make your speakers disappear.the effect of the silver wire helps from top to bottom.when you put the silver wire on,do one speaker first and listen. you will hear the slight amount of grunge on one speaker and how improved the sound will be on the other speaker. the first time i tried it, i was 2 feet away from the one speaker and could not identify any sound coming from it. i could hear the sound coming directly from the other speaker although i was closer to the speaker with the silver wire. another thing i do with pauls' wire is double up and twist or overlap them about 2 inches apart until i get to about 5 inches from each end. i have a tri-wired setup ( tyler acoustic speakers, WOODMERE'S with outboard crossovers ) so i only double up on the woofers, but only use single runs of silver to each amp/speaker binding post. talking with  ANTHONY over at ABERDEEN COMPONENTS, its the silver that is needed with the copper. if you look at some of the high priced cables, the higher up the price goes, you will notice this is where they start to add in the silver wire. i believe its worth the try to see if you notice a big jump in improvement. i have informed paul of the sonic benefit. he emailed me that he was concentrating on what he has now because of the favorable comments in one of the stereo mags. i hope some try the items i mentioned. the first thing i would do is the grounding scheme, and then go from there.


bill