Recently had to replace my speakers (new Martin Logan Clarity's), and am now looking at the rest of my old equipment. Current amp is a Hafler DH200, so I read with interest about AVA's re-cycle of this chassis. But I have also seen criticism of the original Hafler concerning its inadequate power supply. I see that the AVA rebuild retains the old power supply. Could you please comment on this for me as a novice?
Someone told me that they used the identical power transformer for the DH-200, DH-220, and XL-280. It's a _very_ robust transformer. The bridge rectifier in the 200/220 is quite sturdy. My DH-220 had a pair of big soup can filter caps originally.
I really don't see that the power supply in these amps could be considered to be inadequate.
The only problem with the Hafler chassis is that the circuit boards mounted on the heatsinks are close to the transformer. According to AVA, this can cause some problems. The new AVA chassis keep the power supply well away from the signal circuitry.
I had my DH-220 upgraded to a Mosfet 250 C, and then more recently to an OmegaStar. I'm going to be sending it back to AVA pretty soon to get the EX output devices put in.
I have never been unhappy with this amp, in any of its incarnations. I don't notice any hum or noise, so I'm not sure how much of a factor the cramped case is. Output power is more than sufficient for anything I've ever done with it.
I think you get a bit more amp by upgrading your DH-200 than by buying a new OmegaStar 240EX. But it's a bit more expensive too. (And don't forget that you can sell your DH-200 if you buy the 240EX too.)
In my case, it was most cost-effective to upgrade my old amp, because it was already a Mostfet 250 C, and it wound up being cheaper than buying a new amp.
If I were doing it now, it would be $899 to go from Mosfet to OmegaStar EX. I would be very tempted to get the 240EX instead. (I think "very tempted" may not be strong enough. How about "highly likely?")
