Felicia Project Web Site

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 8231 times.

randytsuch

Felicia Project Web Site
« Reply #20 on: 29 Dec 2005, 08:03 pm »
Hi
Another place you could host the page is at blogger.com.
AFAIK, blogger does not have a bandwidth limitation.
The only reason I mention this is I can't view your page right now, it says the you've exceeded your data transfer rate.

Randy

audioferret

$2.95 a month - why not?
« Reply #21 on: 29 Dec 2005, 08:18 pm »
I just took the plunge and upgraded to Geocities Plus.  It got the ads off of my site, gave me tons of space, and plenty of download capability.  The site is now back up and running. :wink:
-AF

Occam

Felicia Project Web Site
« Reply #22 on: 29 Dec 2005, 08:26 pm »
Audioferret,

Congrats on the popularity of your website that has generated so much traffic that you've exhausted your bandwidth.... :(

Not to be a pain in the arse (well actually I do mean to be a pain), could you please, please, please do those measurements of voltage sag with the various incandescant lightbulbs. I'll even reimburse you for the bulbs  :? Its important to know so others can judge whether these transformers are appropriate for their components.

TIA,
Paul

audioferret

I'm on it :)
« Reply #23 on: 29 Dec 2005, 08:44 pm »
Paul,

  Sorry for the delay, buy I didn't have time last weekend as I was still tweaking the project.  But, now that it is done, it is slated for full testing this weekend.  I will also add a page to show how I conducted the tests.

-Will

audioferret

Testing Complete
« Reply #24 on: 1 Jan 2006, 02:51 am »
I have completed the power handling testing of my Felicia project, with the results posted here:

http://www.geocities.com/ghaunadaur99/audio/felicia9.html

I am not sure how to analyze the results, but I will post conclusions as soon as I understand them... :oops:

-AF

samplesj

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 463
Felicia Project Web Site
« Reply #25 on: 1 Jan 2006, 03:31 am »
Are you using the MPJA 24V CT (12-0-12)10A TRANSFORMER that Occam linked to in the main construction thread?

The reason I ask is that it appears to be nominally a 240VA transformer from the description on the MPJA site, but the description on your site (first page) calls it a 170VA.  The old transformers were around that so was it just a typo or are they really marked 170VA when viewed in person and their site is just a little off?

Either way it looks like we need to derate by around 6-8x to be safe.

Occam

Felicia Project Web Site
« Reply #26 on: 1 Jan 2006, 04:28 am »
Will,

Thanks for the measurements! I forgot to ask you to also measure the input voltage to your Felicia, as well as the output voltage with no load. To complete the analysis, You'd now calculate the actual load (approximate) as W = (Vm^2) / Rtot
where W is the first order appoximation of power consumption
Vm is the measured output votage of the Felicia powering that load Rtot
and
Rtot it the net resistance of the total load of the specific loads in parallel -
Rtot = 1 / [ 1/R1 + 1/R2...+ 1/Rn ]
where R1...Rn is the individually calculated nominal resistances as described previously.

It appears that these 240va MPJA transformers might support greater loads, prior to a 10-15% drop in output voltage, than those unobtainium A41 Signal transformers from BGMicro. A good thing given that they're more expensive, $18 vs $10ea. This is very good news, as I tend to be suspicious of no-name transformers.

While ideally, we'd like to power each component isolated from each other, I've found the difference between individual and shared powered (within voltage drop constaints) to not be that substantial.

I'm presently working on additional filtering/isolation from a single Felicia or individual balancing transformer, so the performance of these MPJA transformers is quite encouraging.

I want to thank you for 'stepping up to the plate' and being the first to try these transformers, a great service for those still waiting for the Signal A41s. I'm looking forward to your completing the calculations to see whether we'll get much advantage over the Signal A41s. (its too close to New Years and I'm too tired to do the calculations)

Happy dance,
Paul

audioferret

Testing Complete
« Reply #27 on: 1 Jan 2006, 08:49 pm »
I have updated the site as requested.  I need feedback before I post more in-depth analysis.  The numbers may surprise you at places, but I have double-measured every indicator.  I'm taking a break now, that is a lot of HTML coding. :lol:

-AF

04dgmsilv

Felicia Project Web Site
« Reply #28 on: 2 Feb 2006, 10:31 pm »
I am sort of following audioferret's use of the MPJA xformers and building a balanced/linear SB3 power supply.  One question though for those who are familiar with the MPJA xformers, on the both the inlet and outlet side, what wire is hot vs. neutral?

In my case i probably does not matter which is which on the balanced side though as the linear 5V supply does not have a requirement.

Thanks,
Dan