I was lucky enough to attend the small gathering at Jesse's. His overall system is well balanced and delivers explosive dynamic swings. The system was a unknown to me, preamp, amp, speakers, and a RAM modified Pioneer 563.
I brought along three diy amps to see how the Superphon handled pairing with different partners. All three have differing topologies, sensitivities, and imput impdeances.
First was a dual mono digital amp using the boards from two SI 5066. The preamp drove the 10K input impedance well. The overall sonic color of the 5066 came through in spades. This did not match well, the imaging lost focus, and a sterile texture was imposed ovr the upper mids. This to my ears is the house sound of the 5066 amps. Think it is the ceramic coupling caps used on the surface mount boards.
Next was a Hirega Le Monstre. This 8 watt class A amp has a 27K input impdeance. The sound was much improved. The most striking sonic artifact was note decay. A cut was listenied to that featured solo vibraphone. The length of each note was longer than Jesse's Carver, and the Ernes-T. This amp has a soft, warm texture and balance. The Superphon imposed no sound of its own and let the sound of the amp through. This partnering has a little overipe, fat lower bass. It was a little too much, not taunt like the Carver.
Last amp run was a new one. Only finished the night before, it is an opamp based unit, with a LM3886 current source. It is less colored than the other two amps. It also has a 100K input impedance. Here the overall sonic picture seemed close to perfect. The imaging, frequency response, and dynamics were first rate.
Later we tried Jesse's Sony preamp. This highly rated unit had been run through a modifier and delivered fine sound. It was tried with my last amp and the big Carver. There was a muffling of sound. A lot of fine details did not come through this unit. I could not live with it after hearing the Superphon under the same conditions.
Overall I was much impressed with this new Superphon. It is a big, heavy solid unit. The sonics are exceptional. could not find a single flaw in it.
I too am a former Rev II G owner. It was nice, but flimsy, cheaply made by comparison. Also it always exhibited a low level grunge that could be heard with your ear next to the tweeters. This new unit is dead silent, even with the stepped volume pot cranked up. This low noise level is highly important to me. The differances between components is sometimes the ability to resolve very low level information. A low noise floor is needed to hear these.
Most of the preamps I have used over the last seventeen years have been tubed. The last two in my system are solid state. To my ears the tube units are euphonic, adding a texture, sound of their own. This only took fifteen years to figure out. Slow learner.
I am not the best type to audition a new product of this quality. I build my own nowdays. But if I was going to purchase a linestage today a call to Superphon would be made. This is a perfect unit, colorless, and seems to be able to drive any amplifier.
If anyone liked the sound of the old Superphon units, try to hear this new one. It is in another league. Just as they were 700.00 preamps that matched the 2000.00 competition, the new one is a 2000.00 preamp that is the equal of todays 7500.00 units.
Stan Warren is doing it again.
George