0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 2936 times.
Thanks for taking the time to post the data.I think as more people get to hear systems that have room and/or speaker correction they will begin to understand how powerful and essential these tools are to maximizing their audio enjoyment and investment.George
Hey Eric,Maybe I am not following this completely. Can you explain your measurements to me? Are the top curves before correction and the lower ones after correction?Are we seeing left speaker and right speaker measurments on each chart?On the top charts are each line (horizontal dotted line) representing 9db?Then on the lower chart each dotted line repreents 5db?
yeah.... what he said He be much better writer than I be........
Eric,Are you currently, or planning, to do the xo's in the amps? I think this is a VERY good idea and I only wish I had the funds to buy 3 TACT amps to try it for myself.
I am just wondering why it is that it still looks so rough even after correction.The Alon, by contrast, looks great even without correction.I hav ...
Danny, that curve is not post-correction -- rather it is the filter itself, showing the attenuation needed by frequency to form the target curve. If you take the measurements and sum it with this curve, the result should be the desired target.
Flat in-room response was a goal for Carl M. in desiging this speaker, and he seems to have done it successfully. I don't know how it would measure in the near field or in an anechoic chamber, ao that is not how I listen I don't really care
I'll be sure to let you know how my experimentation with DSP active amping goes, just as soon as I finish up my amps.