Receiver recommendations?

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 5237 times.

CornellAlum

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 493
Receiver recommendations?
« Reply #20 on: 11 Jul 2005, 06:01 pm »
I didn't even know BC had a crossover for the larger.  It's passive, I was under the assumption there wasn't one.  I do use the same amp that the new active subs have in them though.  I think I am a little confused.

Daryan

John Casler

Receiver recommendations?
« Reply #21 on: 12 Jul 2005, 04:26 am »
Quote from: CornellAlum
I didn't even know BC had a crossover for the larger.  It's passive, I was under the assumption there wasn't one.  I do use the same amp that the new active subs have in them though.  I think I am a little confused.

Daryan


The passive x-over is available if you are running pre-outputs from two channel and a  "full range" signal.  It is not needed if you have a LFE channel that has bass management.

Pocketchange

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 34
MR. CASLER....
« Reply #22 on: 14 Jul 2005, 01:46 am »
Thank You,

Not too sure if the SX1250 has the LFE you refer to, I think it does but my ole' 1250 does sound acceptable tho'.

And if I had the room, another Larger WOULD be added to the mix! :lol: