feedback per se is not a bad thing. designing a product is a series of goals and compromises and theres no one best way to do things. theres a good thread on diyaudio that bob cordell, nelson pass and john curl have contributed heavily to, interesting read but also a lot of math.
Have you ever heard amps / equipment designed this way - as a system? I am living with it. When the fact that the original designer (Charles Hansen) was also a "tube guy" who wanted the magic of tubes and the "no fuss" of solid state, it might make one take notice. (I did)
When you hear speakers from a designer (Danny Richie) who mentions "smearing" "phase" and "timing issues", repeatedly, it might make one take notice. (I did)
Then... when you discover that the focus from the amp / equipment designer was also focused on TIMING issues... you start going down the path of synergy... and "connecting the dots of what is important".
It appears to me, the designers of my speakers (Danny Richie), and all of my gear (Ariel Brown), both think Timing Issues are critical.
And then you hear it, it's visceral, and you know. And since I am really smart, I connected those 2 dots and added 1 + 1 and got my answer... and you "stop searching for gear because, as much as you tell yourself otherwise, there's just something not quite right".
"John Curl and "what can't be done" without Feedback..." Charles Hansen at Ayre was friends with John. I've seen the stuff on the DIY Forum. There are some designers, (Danny Richie included) who want to share their secrets enough to educate why one way is better than another. Ariel Brown at Ayre has been designing their stuff for the last 15-20 years or so. As for "no one best way to do things"... well, my ears tell me some ways are definitely better than others.
About for what is possible, or not:
Have you heard the story when Charlie called John Curl to brag to John about what he and Ariel did to reach a super low distortion figure without feedback, which John said was impossible. The video below talks about Feedback and the "Why?".
I share this because Brandon seams to be looking for what / why to buy from a difference / design standpoint. After experiencing it in a number of pieces of gear, tube and solid state, many of which I still own... this Feedback issue is, for me, the #1AAA cornerstone for "the magic". Show me an amplifier with high output impedance, like the First Watt M2 mentioned, and I want to hear it.
It seems to me, doing homework on the design goals, goals that are more than just flowery prose and actually explain the tangible benefit, is important when trying to find the right gear. I've found what make me happy. I'd encourage others to do the same... find tangible differences in gear for why something is different / better than something else... connect the dots, and Listen. It is an interesting psychological exercise for how people choose gear, unfortunately, I sense it's often herd mentality. And then it shows up on the used market....
Enjoy and be sure to rewind further back once they stop talking about beer.

Ariel is at the bottom and is a humble genius. The other 2 guys are no longer there. I hope at least it's food for thought for some... it's been a revelation for me.
https://youtu.be/Y33BcwX5jGE?si=MatWl_-b0PiFtK_F&t=1913
