Kurt:
Wow, that little JVC must be as good as I think it is. Totally happy driving my Maggies but since I used to own the BG 520DX (with the 50-inch BG driver) I would think you could hear any problems with that monster BG driver. In my experience, the BG drivers are close to state of the art.
That little JVC really shows the promise of digital amps.
Hi Horizons,
Before I switched to the JVC, I used a DIY 200W/channel Tripath amp to drive the B&G drivers through a speaker-level passive crossover. I am not sure whether the JVC is better than the Tripath amp, but since I now use a Behringer digital crossover, the multi-channel volume control of the JVC becomes a necessity. The JVC does sound better than the Panasonic XR-45 in this particular application.
I agree with you that the B&G drivers are fairly special. In the last 8 years since I built the B&G system, I've tried quite a few speaker projects, and the B&G system is still the the flag ship in my fleet. It is, however, quite difficult to extract the best out of the B&G drivers. For instance, the baffle width and shape have a huge influence on the sound. Eight years after building them, I am still tweaking the speakers and the electronics driving them. The biggest improvement was replacing the original bass boxes with two dipolar open-baffle bass modules with four 18" drivers stacked on each side.
By the way, what caused you to switch from the B&G RD-50 speakers to the Maggies?
Best,
Kurt