0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 11520 times.
PTFE has a lower dielectric constant than PVC (for instance). It's also constant with frequency, unlike PVC.
teh contact resistnace between a commercial device and residential device has about as much effect on sound as the position of the sun during the day If contact pressure has an effect on sound, why do nudnicks replace hard wire power cords with removable IEC types. you just created ANOTHER contact point..and IEC plug in, are pretty insecure.
they make wire for specific functions, freqs., enviorments. Why would a 14 ga. cable make a CD player sound better than the fuly functional, within ampactiy, make it sound better? a CD play is barley a 1A load. A 10 guage line cord which is capible of 30 A, for a product that is a load of 1 A or less? Why not replace the line cord on your TV? Shouldn't it improve it's performance?
How does 6 feet of low-inductance cord make a difference when there is 25 feet of ROMEX in the wall?A typical 6-foot 14 AWG rubber cord and 25 feet of ROMEX has inductance of 7.2 uH and resistance of 235 mohms, ignoring the plug resistance effect. Therefore, the voltage drop at 20kHz will be: I(wL+R)= I(.905+.235) = I(1.14). With a 6-foot [XXX power cord] and 25 feet of ROMEX, the inductance is 5.9 uH and the total resistance is 147 mohms. This is an 18% reduction in inductance and a 37% reduction in resistance. The voltage drop for this combination will be I(wL+R) = I(.741+.147) = I(.888). So at a fixed dynamic current I, the voltage drop in the entire power feed at 20kHz is 22% smaller with a [XXX power cord]. The reality is even more compelling. When you add in lower plug and receptacle resistance and the fact that the di/dt on the power cord will have spectra well above 20kHz with some amplifiers, the low-inductance cord makes an even bigger difference.
So then resistance is irrelevant? Every and all cables with the same current rating will be just as good?
While I am happy to buy audio gear based on what I hear, I also really like the approach that audioengineer takes, using science to get a better understanding of how measured performance of cables impacts on their performance in audio systems. Here's a good data-driven explanation of the age old question of....QuoteHow does 6 feet of low-inductance cord make a difference when there is 25 feet of ROMEX in the wall?A typical 6-foot 14 AWG rubber cord and 25 feet of ROMEX has inductance of 7.2 uH and resistance of 235 mohms, ignoring the plug resistance effect. Therefore, the voltage drop at 20kHz will be: I(wL+R)= I(.905+.235) = I(1.14). With a 6-foot [XXX power cord] and 25 feet of ROMEX, the inductance is 5.9 uH and the total resistance is 147 mohms. This is an 18% reduction in inductance and a 37% reduction in resistance. The voltage drop for this combination will be I(wL+R) = I(.741+.147) = I(.888). So at a fixed dynamic current I, the voltage drop in the entire power feed at 20kHz is 22% smaller with a [XXX power cord]. The reality is even more compelling. When you add in lower plug and receptacle resistance and the fact that the di/dt on the power cord will have spectra well above 20kHz with some amplifiers, the low-inductance cord makes an even bigger difference.Notice that the voltage drop is calculated for a fixed I (current). This indicates that there is more to power cables than just their current rating! Even if you do not agree that voltage drop has any impact on sound quality, I find this explanation much more intellectually stimulating and factual than cryptic references to "speed of light circuits" or "magic dust." To be fair, while measurements are objective, they may not be measuring the right things. The question then becomes, what do we measure? If we are unable to find measurements that correlate with what we hear then we just have to make a decision without having the crutch of science to lean on.
you are reading too many cool ads. You just don't get it.