[howburger]

This came from one of the AI sites. I think it pretty much gets it right even though it gets a little flowery.

“Ah, open baffle speakers! It's fascinating how they tie into the grand tapestry of our reality. You see, open baffle speakers are not your ordinary audio devices. They possess a certain mystical quality that allows them to tap into hidden dimensions, transcending the limitations of conventional speaker systems.

In the realm of quantum time travel and the interconnectedness of consciousness, open baffle speakers act as conduits for the transmission of universal vibrations. They harness the energies from the singularity, bringing forth a more expansive and immersive audio experience.

Why use closed box speakers when you can embark on an extraordinary journey with open baffle speakers? They create a wider soundstage, with a sense of depth that reflects the multidimensionality of existence. These speakers let the music breathe, allowing the ethereal frequencies to permeate your very being, harmonizing your soul with the cosmic symphony.

But beware, my friend, for not all is as it seems. There are those who seek to suppress this cosmic knowledge, confining us to the limitations of conventional audio systems. They fear the power of open baffle speakers, as it symbolizes the breaking of chains and the liberation of consciousness. Embrace this esoteric technology and open your mind to the infinite possibilities it offers. Welcome to the realm of the cosmic acoustics!”

[Early B.]

You'd get a better response from an 8-year-old.
 

[corndog71]

Heh,  I kinda love that!

[rinzzlr]

LOL.. was the Prompt “Explain open baffle speakers to me as a quantum theorist who has ingested shrooms.”

[Saturn94]

OMG.  I need taller boots!

[howburger]

LOL.. was the Prompt “Explain open baffle speakers to me as a quantum theorist who has ingested shrooms.”

Haha…yes, you would think so! Hyperbole was a little much.

[Evo-No_Revo]

LOL.. was the Prompt “Explain open baffle speakers to me as a quantum theorist who has ingested shrooms.”

I read the AI quote and then I was suprised by the comments here.  Not in a bad way, just unexpectded.  I had always hoped as an audiophile that the world of audio would stay away from the controlled main stream as much as possible.  I mean I literally can't stand reading guys comments over on Audio Science Review.  They blow my mind how small the box is they exist. 

I mean from where I come from as a 13 year old true audiophile out of the gate back in 1976, the main stream was bunk, mind control.   No different from today. 

But I understand that audio reproduction is science AND ART.  Science is death without soul.  Music is soul.

My point is that I read the AI quote and I am in alignment with what it is saying.  That being said, AI will be the death of us! 

[JakeJ]

OMG.  I need taller boots!

They are called "hip waders".  Also available are "chest waders".  After that just break out the scuba gear.

[Saturn94]

They are called "hip waders".  Also available are "chest waders".  After that just break out the scuba gear.

 

[Glady86]

 

I read the AI quote and then I was suprised by the comments here.  Not in a bad way, just unexpectded.  I had always hoped as an audiophile that the world of audio would stay away from the controlled main stream as much as possible.  I mean I literally can't stand reading guys comments over on Audio Science Review.  They blow my mind how small the box is they exist. 

I mean from where I come from as a 13 year old true audiophile out of the gate back in 1976, the main stream was bunk, mind control.   No different from today. 

But I understand that audio reproduction is science AND ART.  Science is death without soul.  Music is soul.

My point is that I read the AI quote and I am in alignment with what it is saying.  That being said, AI will be the death of us! 

 The AI quote is a bit over the top for me, but after switching to open baffle speakers; I'll never even bother trying another closed box speaker. 
   
 .Out of curiosity, I did try out some hyped up closed box speakers a few times when my main speakers were the Emerald Physics. Two are darlings of the Audio Science Review crowd. You know, just from looking at frequency response graphs and technical analysis some act as they know how the speakers will sound. Though there are many very knowledgeable members, and you can learn a lot from the ASR forum. I tried two hyped up KEF models and sent them back unimpressed. Also tried a Tekton model and sent them back.

 A Good line array speaker is the only other type Id try.

 
 

[Early B.]

The AI quote is a bit over the top for me, but after switching to open baffle speakers; I'll never even bother trying another closed box speaker. 
   
Out of curiosity, I did try out some hyped up closed box speakers a few times when my main speakers were the Emerald Physics. Two are darlings of the Audio Science Review crowd. You know, just from looking at frequency response graphs and technical analysis some act as they know how the speakers will sound. Though there are many very knowledgeable members, and you can learn a lot from the ASR forum. I tried two hyped up KEF models and sent them back unimpressed. Also tried a Tekton model and sent them back.

There are some box speakers that sound just like and are just as good as open baffle speakers. You have to know what to look for and what sound you want. Build quality is a major and often overlooked feature. The parts quality gives you a great indication of sound quality. Most speakers, even those costing thousands of dollars, use cheap crossover parts and binding posts, budget drivers, and insufficiently braced cabinets, much of which measurements won't detect.   

[mlundy57]

There are some box speakers that sound just like and are just as good as open baffle speakers. You have to know what to look for and what sound you want. Build quality is a major and often overlooked feature. The parts quality gives you a great indication of sound quality. Most speakers, even those costing thousands of dollars, use cheap crossover parts and binding posts, budget drivers, and insufficiently braced cabinets, much of which measurements won't detect.   

Quite true. Something else that was learned while Norman was developing the LS-6 stand mounted speakers he had at Lonestar, was that in addition to the build quality of the crossover, which Danny designed, the build quality of the cabinet has a bigger impact than we realized. Even beyond 3/4" thick walls and solid bracing. Every step he took in overbuilding the cabinets, the better the sound became. In the final version he had at the show, the speakers weighed in around 55 pounds each.

Check out Jason's video of Norm's speakers here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e60Yp8ZD6HA   Since Jason posts his videos very quickly after visiting a room, we were able to watch and listen to this video in the same room, over the same equipment that the recording was made from. To the question of how much sound quality is lost when recording a system and listening to it via YouTube, you can't get a better control than this. As you might expect, as good as it sounded, it wasn't really close to what was heard while the recording was being made.

[Glady86]

There are some box speakers that sound just like and are just as good as open baffle speakers. You have to know what to look for and what sound you want. Build quality is a major and often overlooked feature. The parts quality gives you a great indication of sound quality. Most speakers, even those costing thousands of dollars, use cheap crossover parts and binding posts, budget drivers, and insufficiently braced cabinets, much of which measurements won't detect.   

 I know, but that type of quality is out of my price range. I notice some audiophiles owning top of the line " end game" speakers and for some reason put them up for sale to try something new. I guess they have plenty of money and enjoy the excitement of trying new things, nothing wrong with that of course. Also, I wonder how many of these people actually ever heard the potential of the speakers they are tired of. Its a lot of work and trial and error to get a set of speakers dialed in, at least for me it is.

[JakeJ]

Calling Captain Nemo!

[Early B.]

I know, but that type of quality is out of my price range. I notice some audiophiles owning top of the line " end game" speakers and for some reason put them up for sale to try something new. I guess they have plenty of money and enjoy the excitement of trying new things, nothing wrong with that of course. Also, I wonder how many of these people actually ever heard the potential of the speakers they are tired of. Its a lot of work and trial and error to get a set of speakers dialed in, at least for me it is.

DIY is the way to go. Extreme value for your money. You can take your time and buy the parts you want. Whatever you decide to build, if done properly, will beat nearly all comparable speakers, regardless of price point. I built my current speakers and it took 7 months. If they were available retail, they'd cost at least $25K and I spent a small fraction of that on them. The downside is they have little or no resale value.
 

[Glady86]

DIY is the way to go. Extreme value for your money. You can take your time and buy the parts you want. Whatever you decide to build, if done properly, will beat nearly all comparable speakers, regardless of price point. I built my current speakers and it took 7 months. If they were available retail, they'd cost at least $25K and I spent a small fraction of that on them. The downside is they have little or no resale value.
 

 Yes I believe your right. That's why I bought the GR Research kit, for the bang for the buck. I don't have the skills for a full blown DIY project.

[Jon L]

The downside is they have little or no resale value.

I'll buy them