0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 24365 times.
Great information. Thank you. I take it this is with the rhodium/copper bananas and the rhodium/copper spades. I have some Furez FZ124AS laying around. Am on the edge of my seat.Thanks
How do you compare the Mogami to the Canare?
I've been listening to them a lot for the last week, on all types of material.Here's how I score them:Plusses: Best lower mid down to low bass response, depth, clarity, definition and power I've had. Aces, imo. Marvelous instrumental body; this is not a thin, sterile presentation, but much more like real instruments in space. Very good separation, depth and width; paints a very credible uniform image from top to bottom. No listening fatigue; I'm listening more just for the pleasure and forgetting the equipment.Minuses: Still not quite as transparent and spatially separated as the best I've had. Very top end (small orchestral bells, triangles, decay of small cymbals) is still a bit recessed- it's all there, just a bit further back. However, mid-treble, like violins and such are marvelous, with superb harmonic balance. Gorgeous, no grit or grain.So, if you don't mind spending $$$ and have a high-rez system, there are better you can find in some areas, but these are a joy to listen to even in a very high rez system, a real feat for under $200 assembled or $70 DIY, IMO.I'm still burning in the Furez; they also sound promising. They feature mixed guage stranded OFC, 12 ga. per conductor (star quad) and foamed polyethylene dielectic. A little harder to terminate as they can't be stripped as most wires can. The dielectric must be cut and peeled away.So far the Canare doesn't seem to to be as good as the other 2, but may need more breaking in.
