What the 2-channel Guys Should Learn From HT

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 5812 times.

Early B.

Re: What the 2-channel Guys Should Learn From HT
« Reply #20 on: 3 Aug 2024, 05:27 pm »
I just tested a gentleman's hearing with tone generator, and he couldn't even hear 1kHz tone  :o
What frequencies and tones need to be heard to create "soundstage"?

https://onlinetonegenerator.com/

All frequencies????  Bass plays a major role in soundstage production.

WGH

Re: What the 2-channel Guys Should Learn From HT
« Reply #21 on: 3 Aug 2024, 08:19 pm »
Bass plays a major role in soundstage production.

I would add sub-bass, think 25 Hz. Most of the time I can't hear if my sub is on but the sound field collapses when I turn it off.

VinceT

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 683
Re: What the 2-channel Guys Should Learn From HT
« Reply #22 on: 3 Aug 2024, 08:29 pm »
After 25 years in this hobby, I formulated two bold conclusions:

1. Nearly all audiophiles have hyper-artificial systems that are “pseudo-musical.” The reference for “real music” is live music. However, we’ve become accustomed to the sound of studio recorded music which is constrained and polite, at best. It’s analogous to the difference between the attending a rock concert vs. watching it on TV.   

2. For an improved stereo sound, you need at least four speakers plus multiple subs. Just like an audiophile has separate components to improve the sound quality, you need separate speakers.

For two-channel listening, you need two things to replicate real music -- a humungous soundstage and incredible dynamics. Two speakers simply won't get the job done, no matter how high end they are. Look at it this way -- if you go to a small jazz club, it will have at a bunch of speakers from the ceiling to the floor. At home, you're trying to duplicate live music with only two speakers, and often with a pair of puny bookshelf speakers. Not gonna happen.

Some speaker designers resort to tricks to re-create ambient sound such as rear firing drivers, supertweeters, open baffle, etc., but all of these attempts are insufficient. Just like HT enthusiasts, many audiophiles have already experienced the benefits of multiple subwoofers. However, the 2-channel guys haven’t yet recognized the value of expanding their main speakers.

Audiophiles should learn lessons from HT enthusiasts regarding the use of presence speakers along the front stage. Personally, I use Audiokinesis LCS speakers and they’re a game changer. There's more bass, more dynamics, and a broader sound. Simply amazing.

I'd like to see audiophiles experiment with presence speakers to get more ambient sound from their systems. My audiophile buddy recently purchased an inexpensive pair of presence speakers and placed them on the floor alongside his open baffle speakers. It was immediately apparent that the presence speakers significantly improved the sound across the entire spectrum. Literally a night & day difference.

Don’t believe me? Just ask the HT crowd.

I don't disagree with you. But live sound comes at you from one direction typically, not surround. Also we are talking multi-channel stereo or the use of HT sound codecs?

I have played around with HT multi-channel for music. You are right about ambients from surround channels. I find it best to have the mains do 75% of work with height and surround adding fill.

Tyson

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 11482
  • Without music, life would be a mistake.
Re: What the 2-channel Guys Should Learn From HT
« Reply #23 on: 3 Aug 2024, 10:57 pm »
For me the perfect speaker would be open baffle, with the same radiating pattern to the front and to the back because the back of the driver is a mirror image of the front side of the driver.  The mids and tweeters need to both be this way.  Then open baffle bass that goes down to 20hz with power.  And, since I listen to a lot of live orchestral music, it would need to be a line array in order to properly convey the huge halls with massive acoustic space that orchestral music takes place in. 

These speakers would also be very very very dynamic and very low distortion due to the load being distributed among so many drivers.  Also dynamics would be further enhanced by the fact that line arrays launch the sound at you as a cylindrical wave.  Point source speakers launch it at you as a set of expanding circular waves.  The practical effect is that point source speakers SPL drops off at twice the rate of line sources.  With a line array, the sound carries through and energizes the listening spot far more than a point source. 

The perfect speaker should also have very narrow baffles for the best imaging possible.  And they should be visually pleasing so they don't dominate the room like a bunch of giant monkey coffins like you get with reference level box speakers.

Early B.

Re: What the 2-channel Guys Should Learn From HT
« Reply #24 on: 3 Aug 2024, 11:12 pm »
Also we are talking multi-channel stereo or the use of HT sound codecs?

We're talking 2-channel only from one direction (no surrounds!). The mains are providing 99.5% of the sound.     

Early B.

Re: What the 2-channel Guys Should Learn From HT
« Reply #25 on: 3 Aug 2024, 11:23 pm »
For me the perfect speaker would be open baffle, with the same radiating pattern to the front and to the back because the back of the driver is a mirror image of the front side of the driver.  The mids and tweeters need to both be this way.  Then open baffle bass that goes down to 20hz with power.  And, since I listen to a lot of live orchestral music, it would need to be a line array in order to properly convey the huge halls with massive acoustic space that orchestral music takes place in. 

Agreed, if you have the money, space, and an agreeable spouse. (Tyson, I believe you have two out of three. :lol:) You forgot to mention that the perfect speaker must be accompanied by copious amounts of OB servo bass. 

Letitroll98

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 5752
  • Too loud is just right
Re: What the 2-channel Guys Should Learn From HT
« Reply #26 on: 4 Aug 2024, 11:09 am »
What a great discussion!  I was introduced to several innovative concepts by former AC member James Romeyn who bowed out of active participation here when he took a financial interest in Audiokinesis.  Presence speakers, 3 way audio, the Pioneer VSX 912 receiver, chip amps, distributed subs, grounding plugs on unused inputs.  Duke LeJeune of Audiokinesis was behind much of these innovations, a brilliant thinker who could care less about convention.  A series of moves and lifestyle changes have forced a dial back on my audio systems, I sold off most of it so these days I'm making do with less.

Presence speakers are fairly easy to implement, most of us is have enough spare equipment lying around to try it.  LeJeune has some specific ideas on how to do it, more involved than tipping up a spare set of bookshelves in the corner.  However less involved than setting up an Atmos system, which hasn't yet been mentioned here btw.

Rather than commenting on the excellent contributions on both sides of the two channel vs multichannel debate I'm going to throw out a different experience.  Corner placement.  Everyone agrees that the elephant in the room is the room.  Almost all of us have some compromise in choosing our audio rooms, mostly being too small.  Centering the system in a corner virtually eliminates sidewall reflections.  And it breaks up common room mode resonances.  I think nothing of hearing sounds far beyond the outside of my speakers.  You do need to treat the corner appropriately for your setup, but it's so much easier.  If you have the time and inclination give it a try.

This discussion has got me thinking about throwing some presence speakers in the mix.  Thanks again guys for the great read.

Tyson

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 11482
  • Without music, life would be a mistake.
Re: What the 2-channel Guys Should Learn From HT
« Reply #27 on: 4 Aug 2024, 07:54 pm »
I heard the Audiokinesis system where they first incorporated the LCS system into the base of their speakers and it was incredibly good.  In fact that year they won 'best in show' from both Jason and I at RMAF.

Jon L

Re: What the 2-channel Guys Should Learn From HT
« Reply #28 on: 5 Aug 2024, 04:40 am »
Pyramid bullet tweeter (JBL clone) arrived, which I just plopped on top of my home theater speakers to break in.  Without any adjustments and with a cheapo (included) electrolytic cap for crossover, I am liking what I hear so far.  It sounds almost as if front and side walls have become panel speakers for ambiance  :thumb:

pyramid1 by drjlo2, on Flickr

AllanS

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 728
Re: What the 2-channel Guys Should Learn From HT
« Reply #29 on: 5 Aug 2024, 10:52 am »
Presence speakers are fairly easy to implement, most of us is have enough spare equipment lying around to try it.  LeJeune has some specific ideas on how to do it, more involved than tipping up a spare set of bookshelves in the corner.
I guess I should have asked for some basic guidance before throwing a couple of speakers in the corner. :duh:
That said, what I did hear is interesting and pleasing.  I'm pretty insensitive to most tweaks so my impressions may not be the most informative.  I can't explain exactly what I heard with the second set of speakers on, but what I sensed was a depth, particularly vocals.  The closest I can describe it is something along the lines of reverb.  It was somewhat difficult for me to really attribute the difference to the presence speakers as turning them on/off resulted in ~ +/- 1.5 dB difference that may have contributed to what I was hearing.
I got the "forbidden post" message last night when trying to up load pics of the set up.  I'll try editing this post with images.
Set up:
Mains Spatial M4 Sapphires (4 ohm)
Ambience: RSL CG4 (8 ohm)
DAC/pre: miniDSP SHD
Amps:
Mains: Nuprime AMG STA (26 dB gain)
Ambience: Schiit Gjallahorn (20 dB gain)
The SHD is normally in place to manage room modes but was perfect for this experiment as it allows you to set the gain for each of the 4 speakers and toggle them on/off quickly.  I set the mains to -3 dB and presence to +6 dB to compensate for amp gain and speaker efficiency and placement differences.



opnly bafld

Re: What the 2-channel Guys Should Learn From HT
« Reply #30 on: 5 Aug 2024, 11:29 am »
I guess I should have asked for some basic guidance before throwing a couple of speakers in the corner. :duh:
That said, what I did hear is interesting and pleasing.  I'm pretty insensitive to most tweaks so my impressions may not be the most informative.  I can't explain exactly what I heard with the second set of speakers on, but what I sensed was a depth, particularly vocals.  The closest I can describe it is something along the lines of reverb.  It was somewhat difficult for me to really attribute the difference to the presence speakers as turning them on/off resulted in ~ +/- 1.5 dB difference that may have contributed to what I was hearing.
I got the "forbidden post" message last night when trying to up load pics of the set up.  I'll try editing this post with images.
Set up:
Mains Spatial M4 Sapphires (4 ohm)

FWIW, YMMV, IMO, etc. Late Ceiling Splash is for monopole speakers, not dipole/bipole speakers. LCS is a way to get late arriving reflections without the need to place bipole/dipole speakers 5~6 feet away from the front wall.

see Early/Late Arrival Conundrum section here:
https://jamesromeyn.com/speakers/main-speakers/general-info-main-speakers/

Early B.

Re: What the 2-channel Guys Should Learn From HT
« Reply #31 on: 5 Aug 2024, 12:38 pm »
FWIW, YMMV, IMO, etc. Late Ceiling Splash is for monopole speakers, not dipole/bipole speakers. 

Similar to AllanS's experience, both of my audiophile buddies have full dipole setups with speakers positioned out in the room and have benefitted from presence speakers.

opnly bafld

Re: What the 2-channel Guys Should Learn From HT
« Reply #32 on: 5 Aug 2024, 05:31 pm »
Similar to AllanS's experience, both of my audiophile buddies have full dipole setups with speakers positioned out in the room and have benefitted from presence speakers.

In your opinion are presence speakers and LCS the same thing?

Zuman

Re: What the 2-channel Guys Should Learn From HT
« Reply #33 on: 5 Aug 2024, 07:55 pm »
Well, my experiment has been interesting.
My normal 2-channel system is a Clearaudio Performance DC Air turntable with Tracer arm and Hana ML cartridge into a Modwright PH 9.0XT phono stage, or a Pachanko Constellation Mini SE server/player, into a Modwright KWH 225i hybrid integrated amp. Speakers are custom two-way T-M-M towers with high-spec crossovers and ScanSpeak drivers. I would say that imaging is one of the system's main strengths.
Just to play around, I connected a cheap and tiny Amazon 100wpc amp to the pre-outs of the KWH 225i and ran cables to an equally cheap and much older pair of KLH bookshelf speakers that I had in a closet. I placed those speakers on their backs near just inside my main towers, and placed blocks under one end to angle them forward slightly, still pointing at the ceiling, but about 30 degrees up from flat.
With the mini-amp's volume turned up about 10% of the way, I could definitely hear a difference. There was a sense of greater air and ambience, and the soundstage did have greater front/back depth. However, the tonality didn't sound right, and bass had that gimicky home-theater sound that seems separate from the rest of the music instead of being nicely integrated and natural.
I think it's worth continuing to experiment. The driver quality of the KLHs is laughably bad compared with my main speakers, and I haven't moved them around much or changed their angle. At the moment, I have a clear preference for my system without the additional speakers, but I'm intrigued enough to keep tweaking.


Tyson

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 11482
  • Without music, life would be a mistake.
Re: What the 2-channel Guys Should Learn From HT
« Reply #34 on: 5 Aug 2024, 08:26 pm »
I think the integration of LCS speakers should be physically as close to the main speaker as possible. 

Zuman

Re: What the 2-channel Guys Should Learn From HT
« Reply #35 on: 5 Aug 2024, 08:36 pm »
I think the integration of LCS speakers should be physically as close to the main speaker as possible.

They're pretty close to the main speakers laterally. My main speakers are about 55" high...I was concerned that placing the presence speakers on top of the towers would place them too close to the ceiling, which is only 9' in my listening room. What do you think?

Tyson

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 11482
  • Without music, life would be a mistake.
Re: What the 2-channel Guys Should Learn From HT
« Reply #36 on: 5 Aug 2024, 08:40 pm »
I’d place them on the floor, directly behind the speaker, firing upwards and slightly angled back.  I’d also limit the signal so that they only produce about 500hz and up. 

Early B.

Re: What the 2-channel Guys Should Learn From HT
« Reply #37 on: 6 Aug 2024, 12:41 am »
In your opinion are presence speakers and LCS the same thing?

Yes. I'm not using "late ceiling splash (LCS)" because that's a term Audiokinesis coined, I believe, and their version is more sophisticated, as mentioned earlier. In the HT world, presence speakers supplement the front speakers with ambient effects, and they're typically installed on the front wall, not lying on the floor as we're describing here. I don't know what to call these speakers -- "ambient floor monitors???" :scratch:

opnly bafld

Re: What the 2-channel Guys Should Learn From HT
« Reply #38 on: 6 Aug 2024, 03:06 am »
Yes. I'm not using "late ceiling splash (LCS)" because that's a term Audiokinesis coined, I believe, and their version is more sophisticated, as mentioned earlier. In the HT world, presence speakers supplement the front speakers with ambient effects, and they're typically installed on the front wall, not lying on the floor as we're describing here. I don't know what to call these speakers -- "ambient floor monitors???" :scratch:

Where are the speakers placed in your audiophile buddies systems?

Early B.

Re: What the 2-channel Guys Should Learn From HT
« Reply #39 on: 6 Aug 2024, 10:34 am »
Where are the speakers placed in your audiophile buddies systems?

One of my buddies has his placed directly behind the speaker. Not sure where my other friend has his placed. Mine are behind and about a foot outside the speakers. I originally set them up directly behind the speakers (mainly to hide them), but they sounded a bit congested there. Since I'm using powered speakers, I can tweak the volume; for passive speakers, it's best to get a pair with the same sensitivity as your front speakers.