So I bought the NX-Oticas that Howard Bozeman was selling. A round trip from the Detroit area to Birmingham, AL was lessened by the fact that I got to spend two nights with my daughter in Nashville!
Now that I have the speakers home and after a couple tweaks and replacing an intermittent tweeter, I am absolutely loving the sound.
I had a pair of Carnegie CST-1s as my introduction to Danny's work. it was a very impressive first step. If those speakers could get me out of 30 years of planar speakers I guessed that one of his all out open baffle designs would be exactly what I wanted.

I am not using the REL Subwoofer as it is for video use only. In fact, based on how much clean bass I am getting in my 12x18 room, I'm not sure how much more bass I need. I am getting much more/better bass than I ever had with my Magneplanars or Apogees.
There is only one thing that I find as a minor issue. Height. Not of the speakers, but in stereo image. With the CST-1s the Neo3 tweeter was exactly at ear level. With the NX-Oticas ear level is at the level of the lower M165-NQ driver. Female vocalists seem somewhat taller than in real life. Thinking about how to make the Neo3 tweeter at ear level, and thinking of the arrangement of the NX-Treme, I came up with this possibility:

I have taken the NX-Treme photo and lopped off the top of the left speaker to simulate the normal NX-Otica and have morphed the right speaker to bring the tweeter to the same height as it was in the CST-1 and moved the lower pair of M-165s to above the upper M-165NQ and filled in the empty space where the lower woofers were. I left the top of the NX-Treme to give an idea how the height of this hybrid version would be between the two speakers.
What do folks think? Have you noticed the issue I am experiencing? What would you think of an NX-Otica that was fully mirror imaged and somewhat taller?
Thoughts for a cold Saturday.
Matt