0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 2622 times.
I owned 3.6 Maggies in a 11'8" by 28' room. I wanted to go for 20. 7 but was afraid too much bass, I bought the 20.7 and after a few years now can say glad I did. My main thing to say is they took a very long time to break in, the low level detail was just not perfect for about a year, and finally really came into it's own only after a year.. Basically it kind of vanished into the floor I listen to a lot of chamber classical, and never at high volumes. So taht may explain it a bit. I think if you play loud, they will break in faster.Same amp from 3.6 a Bryston 4B-SST²As for getting answers, LOL People should be spending all day waiting for anyone to ask questions so they can rush to answer, No life allowed except in dedicated service to guys like you. Sorry we all let you down. I will see the offending minions get punished.
14.5" might be a little too close for comfort. If you look at the design the mylar doesn't start until it's around 20" or so up off of the floor.Can you flip it around so you're doing 19 x 14.5 instead of 14.5 x 19? I can't see the room but I think that might work well for you.I didn't find a need for more power with 20.7s over 3.7s but my amps are 300W tube monoblocks so power isn't an issue here.I'd love to get another set but my room is just too small and they were overpowering - the trombone in the phone booth effect as Wendall put it.
...The new room dimensions are as follows - 19 x 14.5 (14.5 feet is to the listening position). The room is open at the rear, leading into the kitchen, dining room (it is all one open floorplan)....
thick? LOL that is an associated equipment or room problem
Could you post a simple drawing of your floorplan with the dimensions, please? I've taken this statement to mean the listening area is 19' wide with the speakers at 1 end, and the listening position 14.5' away with no walls behind the listening position as it opens to the kitchen. That arrangement would easily accommodate the 20.7.