0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 9322 times.
I have no experience with the WT so I can't comment on it, but if I were you I'd give serious consideration to this:https://www.usaudiomart.com/details/649547395-origin-live-calypso-ii-turntable-amp-zephyr-iii-tonearm-sale-sale/I own three OL arms and one OL table. All are excellent. The arm on offer here is higher in the OL lineup than two of mine, as is the table. IMO it's a killer deal, I'm surprised it hasn't sold yet. Click on my system to get a feel for my rig and tastes.I have no vested interest nor affiliation with the seller. If I didn't already have so much vinyl gear, I'd buy it. Yesterday!!
I've had the original Amadeus for several years now. When other versions came out, I really didn't have much interest. Maybe there were some sonic advantages, but my guess (and it's just that) is that the newer versions were weighted more toward changes in aesthetics or user friendliness. Bottom line is I think the heart and soul of the Amadeus is the genius of the original basic design. I would jump on a MK.1 without hesitation providing it's in pristine condition.
Thank you all for your comments! Do most of you have the Amadeus mk1?
Thanks for your input! It looks like mk1's, mk2's, and GTA's don't show up all that often on the used market (perhaps a testimony to their quality and how much owners like them), so I will have to be patient.
I have a Mk II.I think the biggest difference is on the MK II the top of the golf ball is covered by a silver plate so you can't really tell it's a golf ball. I joke that it's because of all the guys bringing home ~ $3,000 tables and their wives seeing the golf ball and saying WTF did you spend all that money on?!? I'm probably at least half right.I always assumed the MK I and MK II sounded pretty much the same but I don't know for sure.