0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 13512 times.
Just started using Qobuz....The discussion about bandwidth started this topic, but eventually led to my post about Qobuz here:https://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=163396.msg1748978#msg1748978I have a dedicated wi-fi network for audio with a NAS, and I run JRiver and Logitech Media Server on a local PC. iPeng is on my phone as remote control. For internet access, I use a power-line based connection to my main router. All inexpensive hardware, except for the audio system itself, which is: SBT > Cherry DAC DAC 1 HS > Cherry MEGA MK2 MONO > Magnepan 1.7i
The gapless issue is a show stopper for opera. Has anyone found an answer to that?
For those of you saying Quoboz sounds better than Tidal, I assume you are referring to 16/44 resolution? If so, you are saying that Quobuz has some sort of mojo to make their stream BETTER than cd quality? In my system, Tidal is indistinguishable from the same music ripped to FLAC on my HD. Maybe I'm missing something.Shakey
Since there is zero transparency on the part of any of these streaming services we really have no idea of what, if any, processing or conversions occur on their end. All sound a little different. If you've ever used software like Jplay for instance or MQN their developers talk about how even the app is coded can have sonic impacts to varying degrees. I have compared Qobuz, Deezer, and Tidal. They all sound a little different. For me Qobuz was a little too warm or even ever so slightly rolled off at upper frequencies. I can see how it would be preferred to other options, especially if streamed wirelessly. It's a more forgiving presentation (IMO). But I still prefer how Tidal sounds, and their library is just much better, especially for more esoteric genres like Classical Indian music etc., not just rap, pop and rock.
I use LMS and a Squeezebox Touch (into a Bel Canto DAC) as my source. During the Qobuz trial period, I set up a number of back-to-back comparisons where I chose a track from my own server and then set up the same song from Qobuz as the next track. It was very easy to go back and forth between the two tracks. I never did spot a difference in sound quality. I've been very pleased with the sound quality from Qobuz. Its a great way to play music. As with anything in audio, YMMV -- you gotta see what works for you.
I've stated above that the problem with Qobuz is not internet dropout related. It's with specific tracks that I've tracked down to licensing issues and I believe these are very rare. However, I have also stated that Opera in particular is problematic because recordings somewhat arbitrarily differentiate between tracks that happen to occur in the middle of a "song", resulting in a 2 second breakup in mid-note or mid-phrase.This opera is an example: R. Strauss - Ariadne auf Naxos (1912 version) Conducted by Kent Nagano on Warner Classics (although it appears on the cover to actually be Virgin Classics).