Not that I'm aware of.
I think the measurements we have gotten are fairly similar and probably reflective of the drivers and their crossovers. In addition to measurements obtained 3-4m away from the speakers at the listening position, I have done close range measurements of the mids and tweeters on and off axis. The dips and rises I measure stay fairly consistent whether on or off axis, near or far.
For me, flattest response was achieved the the midrange L-pads at about 12:00/12:30 and tweeter L-pads at 1:30/3:00 (L/R channels). Since I have the RM/X ,the tweeter inclination was another variable I had to deal with. Best output seems to be with the tweeter angled just above ear level. A laser pointer attached perpendicular to a straight edge was helpful in getting the pods aligned.
One thing I have not noticed is a big change in measured bass response by removing or adding putty to the passive radiator. However, I think Zybar did measure some changes after replacing all the putty on his Larger subs and RM40s. The wrong amount of putty likely does raise distortion levels -- probably there is a correct amount of mass to match the electrical and mechanical characteristics of the active drivers with their crossovers and of course the enclosure volume. Finding that correct amount is the hard part

I do not have Brian's golden ear. Without the measurement capability of the TacT I wouldn't have been able to optimally tweak the speakers. And once I heard what the room correction can do at the seating position there was no going back...