0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 6927 times.
And just think: They wouldn't be compatible with the $685k Wilson's, because they are wired with Transparent cabling. [/quoteYou know MasterBuilt has other cables that cost much less lol. Yes the Ultra is expensive, but I've seen cables costing 3 times as much. Crazy isn't it.]
And just think: They wouldn't be compatible with the $685k Wilson's, because they are wired with Transparent cabling.
NASA did all the research, paid by tax payers ??? now someone else is making the cables from their research ???
18 g's.... crazy.. but you know what they say " sucker born every minute" ... some of them rich .... you'd think the sellers feel guilty ?
the copper wire you find in the $18g cable you can find in a $1200 cable..
There are two versions of the speaker cable I use. The only difference between them is at some point the manufacturer made a change in the dielectric - the copper conductor used is the same, in the same configuration. I have compared the two versions on two separate occasions. There are clear and repeatable sonic differences between them.So much more goes into this than the ingredients.
Something about how the waves travel down the dielectric and the rate they travel has to be in synch. There are things us mere mortals will never understand about great cable design.
EM (electromagnetic) waves travel at a constant (speed of light) in a vacuum regardless of frequency, however in the presence of a dielectric, they will not only travel at reduced speed but the speed of travel can become frequency dependent. The effect of this is that different frequencies will arrive at different times on the other end of the transmission medium. I've used air dielectric cables for this reason (before converting over to MB), as air is the next closest thing to vacuum in regards to dispersion.This is called dispersion and is one way cables can distort the sound passing through them. So yes, there are a number of important factors in cable design - not just the conductor itself, but its thickness, shape, arrangement (when multiple strands are used), geometry with respect to the dielectric and ground reference, the dielectric properties, etc..There are near infinite possible combinations of these factors which is why you see so many cables out there making all kinds of claims about their superiority of design. And granted there are some folks peddling pseudoscience and charging ridiculous markups for their cables so as always with this hobby, caveat emptor!
Mountainjoe .... I think you misunderstood... maybe I said it wrong... if a wire cost $1000 dollars to make then should it be sold for $1300 ??? most likely not... there was a lot of research and testing and more research and more testing and buying gobs of material so you can try different ways to incorporate the materials together and see what works best plus all the time and effort that it took.. and so on .... that needs to be factored in too...... from what I understand (and it looks like you see the same way ) is an aerospace company did all the work and someone else took the results and made the cable from the results... the results that another company spent the time and money for research and testing... so now the company making the cable can pretty much go into production right of way and make great cables... so does that mean they should factor in the time and research someone else did into the price of the cable ? hope this made my previous post more clear... and lets not compare a Lamborghini to a speaker cable... that is all