0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 7061 times.
It will be interesting to see how the new "Revox" affects the Reel to Reel tape market. The team building it is probably going to do a good job, at a price far lower than the current audiophile tape aficionados have to pay for decks. It will cost about the same as a fine cartridge for our turntables. Of course the new Revox is solid state, which will temper enthusiasm by some. Personally, I look forward to hearing the deck at some point. I'm glad you're enjoying Schwarz' Mahler Symphony No. 5Here is Jim Svejda's review: http://www.yarlungrecords.com/news/mahler-no-5/
Interesting. It would be nice if they provided a sample file.
Oh, I was looking under the file format links
Hi RipTorn, thanks for asking people's opinions of the various formats. This is a serious topic in today's audiophile world, of course, and people take positions that are sometimes reminiscent of religious fervor. My friend David Robinson thinks DSD comes from heaven and PCM comes from Hell, and my friend Arian Jansen (who has designed both PCM and DSD circuits in many applications) leans more into the PCM-is-better camp. And for different reasons.Yarlung is officially agnostic, because I like both PCM and DSD formats. They do sound different, and this flavoring can sometimes be helpful as we make choices in recordings, just as we make choices in cables, microphones and the like. What I can tell you unequivocally, is that the choice of a cable can make a larger difference in the character of the sound than the best PCM vs the best DSD. Making this conversation more interesting (and difficult) is that no DAC converts PCM and DSD to analog equally well, or I should rather say "may not convert DSD and PCM equally well." I have certainly not heard them all. In my experience, DACs tend to have a "sweet spot," so to speak, depending on the designer's ear and the designer's ability. Many holy warriors tackling this topic tend to think that our wonderful little red-book CD is dead. I happen to like CDs, both the physical format and the sound if the recording is made nicely. Many of you probably know Scot Hurwitz. He has an educated ear, and he sent me an email I thought I should share with the people on this thread.... I quote below from our Facebook post a few days ago:Music aficionado and reviewer Scot Hurwitz kindly allowed me to post his email about the new James Matheson CD. Thank you Scot! And thank you Jim, for writing such engaging music.On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Scot Hurwitz wrote:Dear Bob,I just wanted to send you an email to let you know how happy I am with your newJames Matheson cd. I just got the cd a few days ago and finally found some timeto take a listen and all I can say is WOW! Fantastic. The music is interesting andjust not your average everyday run of the mill classical music that has been recordedover and over and over a thousand times. The recording quality is stunning, quite easily oneof the best sounding disc’s in my collection (I have several thousand discs). The clarityis beautiful and the tonality is lush and gorgeous. Please keep doing what you’re doingbecause you just keep getting better and better. Thank you for renewing my faith inrecording engineers and cd’s in general. It’s a shame that most of the regular mainstreamred book cd’s one buys nowadays sound like s[****]. If it wasn’t for ECM or ACT music outof europe or Your label there wouldn’t be any reason to buy a great new cd player likethe one I just bought a few months ago (Esoteric KO1X). Thank you and keep em coming!Best regards,Scot HurwitzI'm thrilled people who know are appreciating the physical CD so much. Thank you! http://www.yarlungrecords.com/cd33-Matheson.html
Dear Mark and Michael,Thanks for your wonderful questions and comments. First for Michael, our warehouse is in Tennessee, and we ship the same day or next day we receive an order. We don't have any CDs which are currently out of stock, I"m happy to say. We did another manufacturing run recently and we are in good shape. Mark's comment about USB cables is interesting to me. Of course there should be no difference in the sound from USB cables. But most of us would agree that the differences can be impressive. I have felt that the differences must originate in timing of the information. The trouble is that our DACs ususally reclock all of this information (and most DACs do this fairly well) which should make the cable irrelevant. One of our engineers, Arian Jansen, explained to me that the difference we hear in various USB cables comes from the grounding schemes in the equipment on either side of the cable, not from the cable itself. In other words, if the grounding is designed differently, different cables will "sound" different between those two devices. It is certainly possible. But to support your point, Mark, I have USB cables I use and cables I avoid. Some have deeper soundstages, some have wider soundstages, some represent transients better, others give crisper fuller bass. Interesting, huh? Best wishes and thanks,Bob
Bob,Thank you. One more question before I place my order. Will the CDs be shipped USPS, FEDEX, DHL, or UPS to Oregon? I plan to buy just 2 CDs first. Regards,Michael