I didn't get the impression he was wowed like he has been on some other gear lately (i.e. Gall Ref 3, BPT 3.5 Sig/Plus conditioner, etc...)
I agree.
I thought it was a strange review, in that he spent much more time trying to define what the amp was (or wasn't) than he did describing how it sounded with music. There was a lot of flowery speech and techno babble, but not a lot of meat where it mattered most IMO.
I haven't heard the DNA500, but I'd like to. I've always been enamored with Steve's work. I even toyed with getting a pair of his highly-modified DNA-125s at one time, but decided the risk matched the expense - both were high. It's rare that I'll buy something expensive that I've never heard, and rarer still when it comes with no return option.
But I've heard the 2250s, in Denver and in my home. It's just one man's opinion, but I don't believe Srajan did them justice with his review. Luckily I don't need Srajan to make my decision for me, nor do I measure the success or failure of my system by how he or anyone else judges the individual components that make it up.
-Jim