0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 4553 times.
I'd forget about the tube integrated for driving the Aerius. ML panels are notorious for being almost purely capacitive at higher frequencies. You need power to get around this, and tube power ain't cheap, even used.
I thought it was a resistive load, if its capacitive its bad news to any amp.
This is from Jeff Dorgay's review:"Building on the success of the Aerius, the Aerius i came out in 1996 and remained in production until 2000. The i featured an improved crossover network, which lowered the critical crossover frequency from 500hz to 450hz and allowed the ESL panel handle more of the critical midrange frequencies. The new model was an improvement in every way, but did feature a lower minimum impedance (2 ohms with the Aerius; 1.7 ohms with the Aerius i) that made them tougher to drive with low-powered tube amplifiers.Performance the modestly powered tube amplifiers at my disposal was mixed. The CJ MV-50 and PrimaLuna Dialog 4 with EL34 output tubes (and about 35-45 watts per channel) had no problem driving the Aerius i, yet the vintage Dynaco Stereo 70 struggled, offering boomy and uncontrolled bass as well as a rolled-off high end. Note to tube aficionados: Make certain you can audition the speakers with your amplifier; the more power, the better and if your amplifier offers a 2-ohm tap, that will help.While these speakers work well with most tube amplification, I’ve always achieved the best balance of musicality, HF extension, and bass control with a vacuum-tube preamplifier and high-current solid-state power amplifier."As the impedance of the panels drops, the capacitance increases, so low impedance, high capacitive reactance.
I have a friend looking for an integrated tube amplifier to connect to a pair of Martin Logan Aerius loudspeakers. Can he find joy for under $700?