Has anyone ever compared a BIT 20 (or Torus equivalent) to a PS Audio P10?

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 1623 times.

Rod_S

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1098
As the title asks I'm curious if anyone has compared the two? If so what were your impressions? Granted the products are a bit different with the P10 being a regenerator but both provide low output impedance and both seem to provide voltage regulation (if using a BIT/Torus AVR unit). I'm wondering if this power regeneration technology really works (i.e. true audible and visual improvements) making the PS Audio units better than the typical power conditioner competition or its an excuse to up the cost of their power products.

Thanks

drummermitchell

Seems there has been a few troubles with ps audio
audioaficianado site has quite a few users there
My Torus(s) have been trouble free for years.

Rod_S

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1098
Yeah I thought about posting the question on AA but there are a lot of PS Audio fan boys :) so to speak there and like the McIntosh and WireWorld following over there true objectivity can be in short supply.

drummermitchell

Yep and the PS fan boys have been bringing up there troubles with their units on that site.
Guess I'm a Torus fan boy an that's OK as they have been trouble free for years and am impressed what they do for the music.
Did the shunyata thing yrs ago also,no thanks as with the BITS or Torus you have no choice but to hear the difference :thumb:.

Ern Dog

Rod,
Interesting question you are asking.  Is there any particular reason you posted this in the Bryston circle and not the power cond. circle?  You might get more responses.

Rod_S

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1098
I didn't even know there was such a circle here. Thanks

Rod_S

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1098
I posted in the power conditioner circle.