6922, et al Burn-in?

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 25625 times.

ACHiPo

6922, et al Burn-in?
« on: 15 Jan 2016, 03:46 am »
I just re-tubed my PSE preamp, and it, well, sounds tubby, rolled-off, tubey.  Not a lot better than before I replaced its 15 year old tubes.

It's been a few years since I listened to it critically with good tubes, but I don't remember it sounding like this. 

I've gotten used to a very nice solid state pre, and then when that died, listened straight from the DAC to the amps, so maybe this is what it always sounded like, but it doesn't seem right and I'm not that crazy about it.

So my question is--do 6922s (these are 7DJ8s) need time to warm up, burn in, or otherwise sound right? 

JackD

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1400
Re: 6922, et al Burn-in?
« Reply #1 on: 15 Jan 2016, 03:52 am »
Give them about 25 hours before you judge, but it may just be a product of the particular tube you chose for the replacement.  Each company had their own "sound."

JakeJ

Re: 6922, et al Burn-in?
« Reply #2 on: 15 Jan 2016, 05:02 am »
Sorry to be picky but a 7DJ8 is not a direct replacement for a 6DJ8=6922.  The 7 indicates it requires 7.6 Volts for the heater, while a 6DJ8 requires 6.3.  So, does the mfr of your preamp say that 7DJ8 tubes can be substituted for the 6DJ8?  If yes then wait for the tube to settle in.  If no then get the correct tubes.  Then let those settle in and tell us what you hear.

Starchild

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 2088
  • Free your mind and your behind will follow!
Re: 6922, et al Burn-in?
« Reply #3 on: 15 Jan 2016, 05:47 am »
Sorry to be picky but a 7DJ8 is not a direct replacement for a 6DJ8=6922.  The 7 indicates it requires 7.6 Volts for the heater, while a 6DJ8 requires 6.3.  So, does the mfr of your preamp say that 7DJ8 tubes can be substituted for the 6DJ8?  If yes then wait for the tube to settle in.  If no then get the correct tubes.  Then let those settle in and tell us what you hear.

According to Kevin Deal at Upscal Audio the 7d68 is "...absolutely compatible with virtually any product that uses 6922 and 6DJ8   Whether it's an amp, preamp, CD player, whatever."  You can see his video on this page.  I'm using a 7dj8 miniwatt in my pre-amp instead of a 6dj8/6922; sounds great with no problems.  It did take a day or too to fully burn in but it sounded pretty good right out of ther box.  If in doubt contact Kevin directly.

ACHiPo

Re: 6922, et al Burn-in?
« Reply #4 on: 15 Jan 2016, 05:53 am »
According to Kevin Deal at Upscal Audio the 7d68 is "...absolutely compatible with virtually any product that uses 6922 and 6DJ8   Whether it's an amp, preamp, CD player, whatever."  You can see his video on this page.  I'm using a 7dj8 miniwatt in my pre-amp instead of a 6dj8/6922; sounds great with no problems.  It did take a day or too to fully burn in but it sounded pretty good right out of ther box.  If in doubt contact Kevin directly.
I have a pair from Kevin as well (Matsushitas)--Brent Jesse agrees that they are good substitutions, and will last longer because of the higher design operating voltage.  The Valvo tubes are supposed to sound less tubey than the Mullards, and similar to the Siemens (fairly dry sound).

I'm running them overnight and will see what they sound like tomorrow.

E55l2

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 181
Re: 6922, et al Burn-in?
« Reply #5 on: 15 Jan 2016, 08:55 am »
The 7dj8 has the same specifications as the 6dj8 IF you change the heater voltage from 6,3V to 7,6V!
It is not an drop in replacement whatever this Kevin says.

With only 6,3V on the 7dj8 the heater is to cold, to less emission and the tube parameters will change significant. However, it will work....some sound will be there but not as before.
Secondly because of the wrong emission the tube will have shorter lifetime.



According to Kevin Deal at Upscal Audio the 7d68 is "...absolutely compatible with virtually any product that uses 6922 and 6DJ8   Whether it's an amp, preamp, CD player, whatever."  You can see his video on this page.  I'm using a 7dj8 miniwatt in my pre-amp instead of a 6dj8/6922; sounds great with no problems.  It did take a day or too to fully burn in but it sounded pretty good right out of ther box.  If in doubt contact Kevin directly.

FullRangeMan

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 20029
  • To whom more was given more will be required.
    • Never go to a psychiatrist, adopt a straycat or dog. On the street they live only two years average.
Re: 6922, et al Burn-in?
« Reply #6 on: 15 Jan 2016, 11:32 am »
Sorry to be picky but a 7DJ8 is not a direct replacement for a 6DJ8=6922.  The 7 indicates it requires 7.6 Volts for the heater, while a 6DJ8 requires 6.3.  So, does the mfr of your preamp say that 7DJ8 tubes can be substituted for the 6DJ8?  If yes then wait for the tube to settle in.  If no then get the correct tubes.  Then let those settle in and tell us what you hear.
That cathode will be always cold. Achipo is knowing it as I told him afew months before in other topic, but others members say its all OK. :scratch:

FullRangeMan

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 20029
  • To whom more was given more will be required.
    • Never go to a psychiatrist, adopt a straycat or dog. On the street they live only two years average.
Re: 6922, et al Burn-in?
« Reply #7 on: 15 Jan 2016, 12:01 pm »
According to Kevin Deal at Upscal Audio the 7d68 is "...absolutely compatible with virtually any product that uses 6922 and 6DJ8   Whether it's an amp, preamp, CD player, whatever."  You can see his video on this page.  I'm using a 7dj8 miniwatt in my pre-amp instead of a 6dj8/6922; sounds great with no problems.  It did take a day or too to fully burn in but it sounded pretty good right out of ther box.  If in doubt contact Kevin directly.
This is one of the reasons Kevin is millionaire selling tubes, he is a nice guy, very friendly and a good neighbor, but compatible mean say just it works, just works, ie the tube will no explode.

From 6,3V to 7,6V there is more than 19% less tension on the Cathode and people think it is all right.

ACHiPo

Re: 6922, et al Burn-in?
« Reply #8 on: 15 Jan 2016, 03:21 pm »
This is one of the reasons Kevin is millionaire selling tubes, he is a nice guy, very friendly and a good neighbor, but compatible mean say just it works, just works, ie the tube will no explode.

From 6,3V to 7,6V there is more than 19% less tension on the Cathode and people think it is all right.

Hard to imagine becoming a millionaire selling tubes, but more power to him.  High end audio seems to be a great way to make a small fortune--if you start with a large fortune :lol: :green:

Here's the statement on Brent Jesse's website regarding the 7DJ8:
Quote
7DJ8 / PCC88:

This is an unusual tube that must have had a limited range of specific uses. It is virtually identical to the 6DJ8 except for the heater rating, which is 7 volts. I have seen Siemens, Valvo, Telefunken, Philips, Ultron and Matsushita (Japan) brands of this tube. It probably makes a good sub for the 6DJ8 and may last longer due to the higher voltage heater. Some are labelled with only the "PCC88" and others have both types listed on the label. All seem to be good quality. The Japanese factory was set up by Mullard, and these tubes even flash orange at the bottom of the filaments when first energized, like most European triodes do. Most of the European types were made at the Munich Siemens factory, the Hamburg Valvo factory, the Heerlen Holland Amperex Factory, or the Blackburn, UK Mullard factory. These sound just like the best 6DJ8 tubes, the German tubes being mostly neutral, and the Dutch and British tubes having a touch of midrange warmth. Watch for the very rare D-getter types and even rarer pinch waist types, often at bargain prices (compared to 6922 types in these categories) when you can find them. You may want to try a 7DJ8 for the longer heater life in a 6.3 volt circuit, and the lower price!

Valvo 7DJ8:  New Old Stock original Box. The 7DJ8 is identical to the 6DJ8 except for heater voltage. It will sub for the 6DJ8 and will give longer life. All are from Germany, 1960s vintage tubes with the large halo getter. These are very similar in sonics to Telefunken, and will generally outlast any other 6DJ8. A superb hifi tube at a savings.

...and Upscale Audio's blurb on the Matsushita 7DJ8s is similar in content, but much more hype:
Quote
Here's a backstory to this tube-

Back in the 80's I had an Audio Research preamp that used 6922's or 6DJ8's.  And I was well on my way into collecting tubes and figuring out how they sounded, why, and who really made them.

I went down to an old parts store called Dow on Holt Blvd, in a crappy area of Montclair, California.  But I'll go anywhere to get some cool stuff.  While there I found some 6DJ8 in International boxes with tubes inside labeled "Made in Gr. Britain"   I figured I scored as they must be from Mullard, Ediswan Electric, or Brimar.  But upon furthur inspection I found no etched factory codes.  Hmmm.  They looked like Philips/Amperex/Mullard, at least internally.  After some detective work I found they were made by National, also known as Matsushita in Japan.  Eventually National became to be known as Panasonic.  These have the early old National logo on the box with the little cardboard tube holder.

Now I had seen many Japan 5AR4 and EL-34 labeled Made in Gr. Britain that were commonly thought of to be Mullard but were not.  And anybody who knew  them also knew that they were fantastic, well-made tubes.

So I tried them.  Heaven.  They had a sense of ease and grace I associated with the best new old stock tubes in my collection.  I figure how hard can they be to find?   I went looking for them.  One here, two there.  I found a few in RCA boxes, again marked Gr. Britain, but that's about it.  So they remained in my private stash and we have never found enough to test and grade into Gold and Platinum and offer for sale.  Bummer.  So before now we have never had these to offer to our customers.

I recently found a small stash of them, and the heavens parted.  My mind reeled back 20 years and I recalled how I felt when I plugged them in.  They are PCC88, and as you know (or should know) they are a 7 volt perfect plug in substitute into literally every product using 6DJ8 or 6922's.

The sound?  I used them here in a Cary SLI-80 Signature F1 and it was just like I remembered.  The midrange is similar to a real Telefunken 6DJ8, but with better extension on top and bottom.  There is a sense of humanity that is exhibited by the best in new old stock (NOS) tubes.   I was at one point suggesting these for Audible Illusions preamps.  Then I had a guy with a failure we warranted, and thought it was a bad move.  THEN I got a call from a guy that said the Matsushita’s were “The best thing that ever happened to my preamp” referring to his L-1, and that they lasted for years.    And another guy that wrote a review saying it was that good.  So I guess that we will say party on guys.

Look.  I love the super expensive stuff.  Everybody deserves to own some at some point.  But here is an opportunity to get something truly vintage, truly rare, and very sexy that sounds incredible for low $$$ considering you get our grading process.  Buy these along with another type or two and have a blast.  Have your own awakening.   

ACHiPo

Re: 6922, et al Burn-in?
« Reply #9 on: 15 Jan 2016, 03:21 pm »
Here's the update on the PSE with Valvos...

After ~12 hours of running, the Valvos are sounding better--the higher registers are opening up and the mids are getting a bit more transparent.  Even the bass is tightening and the sound level is coming up a bit. The sound is definitely not to my liking, though.  I'm going to let the pre run today while I'm at work so it'll have ~24 hours on it by next listen.  While I'll reserve judgment, at this point I'm thinking a new preamp is in my future.

ACHiPo

Re: 6922, et al Burn-in?
« Reply #10 on: 15 Jan 2016, 03:25 pm »
So, does the mfr of your preamp say that 7DJ8 tubes can be substituted for the 6DJ8?  If yes then wait for the tube to settle in.  If no then get the correct tubes.  Then let those settle in and tell us what you hear.
Well, given that the manufacturer of my preamp retired several years ago, and I have no documentation, I don't know what they say about substitutions.  From my research they seem to be compatible, and the pair I have in right now definitely sounds better than the old Russian 6922s.

I'll keep you posted.

ACHiPo

Re: 6922, et al Burn-in?
« Reply #11 on: 16 Jan 2016, 01:57 am »
After ~ 24 hours of playing music, the bass is still tubby, but the mids and highs are sounding pretty nice.  Good air.  Listenable, but not really my flavor.  The search for a new pre is on, but until I find one I can listen to this.

Starchild

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 2088
  • Free your mind and your behind will follow!
Re: 6922, et al Burn-in?
« Reply #12 on: 16 Jan 2016, 04:44 am »
Have you tried Herbies tube dampers?  I've found them to perform quite well in improving tube performance by reducing vibrations that can impact transparency, sound stage depth and bass among others.  Highly recommended.

FullRangeMan

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 20029
  • To whom more was given more will be required.
    • Never go to a psychiatrist, adopt a straycat or dog. On the street they live only two years average.
Re: 6922, et al Burn-in?
« Reply #13 on: 16 Jan 2016, 10:10 am »
Some datasheet say 7.0V others say 7.6V
Seems there is two types of 7DJ8.

7DJ8 Ratings
Vh    Ih    Cgk    Cak    Cga
7.6    0.3    3.3/6.0    1.8/0.18    1.4/1.4
http://tdsl.duncanamps.com/show.php?des=7DJ8

http://www.revoco.cz/data/datasheets/tubes/6dj8.pdf

E55l2

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 181
Re: 6922, et al Burn-in?
« Reply #14 on: 16 Jan 2016, 12:45 pm »
The P- series have filements for 0,3A! So depending on tube it has different voltages and always the same current.

All those people listening to p-serie tubes in equipment for e-serie tubes (6,3V filements) don't take there amplifiers and listening serious. But if they want to waiste there time and money.....




Some datasheet say 7.0V others say 7.6V
Seems there is two types of 7DJ8.

7DJ8 Ratings
Vh    Ih    Cgk    Cak    Cga
7.6    0.3    3.3/6.0    1.8/0.18    1.4/1.4
http://tdsl.duncanamps.com/show.php?des=7DJ8

http://www.revoco.cz/data/datasheets/tubes/6dj8.pdf

ACHiPo

Re: 6922, et al Burn-in?
« Reply #15 on: 16 Jan 2016, 12:58 pm »
Have you tried Herbies tube dampers?  I've found them to perform quite well in improving tube performance by reducing vibrations that can impact transparency, sound stage depth and bass among others.  Highly recommended.
No I haven't tried tweaks on the pre other than cleaning all the connections and putting it on Daedalus Isolation Devices.  The new tubes were an experiment to see if I could live with the PSE.  Given that it doesn't drive my subs, even after new tubes, I want a different pre.

ACHiPo

Re: 6922, et al Burn-in?
« Reply #16 on: 16 Jan 2016, 01:04 pm »
The P- series have filements for 0,3A! So depending on tube it has different voltages and always the same current.

All those people listening to p-serie tubes in equipment for e-serie tubes (6,3V filements) don't take there amplifiers and listening serious. But if they want to waiste there time and money.....
E55,
You and FRM have me toying with the idea of buying yet another pair of tubes just to make sure that it's the pre and not the tubes, but given that the new tubes didn't enable running both outputs I still want a new pre that will drive my subs.

Starchild

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 2088
  • Free your mind and your behind will follow!
Re: 6922, et al Burn-in?
« Reply #17 on: 16 Jan 2016, 01:40 pm »
The P- series have filements for 0,3A! So depending on tube it has different voltages and always the same current.

All those people listening to p-serie tubes in equipment for e-serie tubes (6,3V filements) don't take there amplifiers and listening serious. But if they want to waiste there time and money.....

Your point is well taken.  When it comes to tube substitution, the best source of information is the manufacturer.  I acknowledge in this instance, I took Kevin's word on it and didn't check with manufacturer; I have just sent the manufacturer an e-mail.  I'll let you know what he says.  But I would add that it's one thing to diasagree but it's another thing to be disagreeable.  When we begin to denigrate the values or intelligence of others, we are, in my opinion, heading out of bounds.  The precesence of civility and courtesy is what makes Audio Circles a much better forum than the Audio Asylum.  Just my 2 cents.  Happy listening all.

E55l2

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 181
Re: 6922, et al Burn-in?
« Reply #18 on: 16 Jan 2016, 02:12 pm »
It is not needed to send an email to the manufacturer of the amplifier because we already have the right information from the manufacturer of the tubes. And it is clear that the 7dj8 can not be on the place of an 6dj8 unless you change the heatervoltage.

If you want to make this a better forum you have to accept some physic laws. It's not a matter of that i like green and others red.



Your point is well taken.  When it comes to tube substitution, the best source of information is the manufacturer.  I acknowledge in this instance, I took Kevin's word on it and didn't check with manufacturer; I have just sent the manufacturer an e-mail.  I'll let you know what he says.  But I would add that it's one thing to diasagree but it's another thing to be disagreeable.  When we begin to denigrate the values or intelligence of others, we are, in my opinion, heading out of bounds.  The precesence of civility and courtesy is what makes Audio Circles a much better forum than the Audio Asylum.  Just my 2 cents.  Happy listening all.

Starchild

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 2088
  • Free your mind and your behind will follow!
Re: 6922, et al Burn-in?
« Reply #19 on: 16 Jan 2016, 02:41 pm »
It is not needed to send an email to the manufacturer of the amplifier because we already have the right information from the manufacturer of the tubes. And it is clear that the 7dj8 can not be on the place of an 6dj8 unless you change the heatervoltage.

If you want to make this a better forum you have to accept some physic laws. It's not a matter of that i like green and others red.

Never the less, I have sent the e-mail and I will report back what he says. I agree its not abouit what we like, it's about how we express it.