0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 18353 times.
Then why do you need to spend another couple hundred for a speed box.Try googling Pro-ject Carbon hum. That makes for good reading.I won't say much more about the Orbit other than it's well represented on other forums and Fremer's review certainly makes it competitive with the other budget tables.I have yet to read any substantive comparison that discusses how a budget Pro-ject is any different from a Rega other than Regas run slightly fast which is of course a feature, not a bug. Just a lot of brand loyalty recs. At least the Orbit had a transparent production process and quite a few comparison reviews with other tables including vintage.
I have to beg to differ on the 2M Red at least in my system. I used one on my Thorens TD-145 TT for a few weeks and it was still too bright. It was dynamic and had some good qualities but it was very fatiguing and it had a lot of background noise. And my system is far from bright with a Pass amp and BAT tube preamp and tube phono preamp. I replaced it with a Nagaoka MP-200 and was astounded at the difference. The back ground was completely black, there was much more detail and no fatigue at all. I would rather have the 2M Blue, Grado Prestige Gold or the Nagaoka MP-110 for about the same price as the 2M Red
Want to get back into vinyl, looking at some options. I have a budget Of up to $650 looking at a few options. Looking at the Project Carbon $449, Project Essential II $299, Rega RP1 $640 so far I like the project carbon. Between these 3 options which one will be the best? Personally I like the Project Carbon, but I'm no guru expert in turntables... Used to own a Technics turntable in my younger days but that's allOf my experience... Thanks!
I would sure like to do a change for change with my Rega P3 + Exact for a TEAC TN-300.But again, that's me, not you.Guy 13
Only a new table? If that is the case you should check out the new Pioneer IMO. See what other reviewers say. It's around $60 more than the RP1 and you could probably get a discount on Pioneer. Still have your records? If so, are they in decent shape? Do you have an RCM or cleaning method and did you budget for additional expenses?You might want to consider another approach:http://www.usaudiomart.com/details/649178305-kenwood-kd5070-turntable/http://www.vinylengine.com/library/kenwood/kd-5070.shtmlhttp://www.usaudiomart.com/details/649171635-yamaha-ypd8/http://www.vinylengine.com/library/yamaha/yp-d8.shtmlI guess used tables aren't for everyone, but you get more performance for your money. The platter on the Yamaha weighs nearly 6 lbs. The "marble" base on the Kenny is polyester resin and ground limestone. It gives solidity the entry belt drivers can only dream about. You might have guessed that I don't like inexpensive belt drive tables. That's because I actually listen. You need a speed controller on virtually all of them to approach the performance of a servo controlled DD. Speaking of upgrades, a new Rega is an upgrade waiting to happen. You might hear opinions to the contrary about speed stability. I suggest going out and listen for yourself. Maybe you'll soon be able to hear the Pioneer. I haven't, but it might be worth the extra cash.neo
That Pioneer PLX1000 (699) got a pretty good write up in the March Stereopile.If it matters.Here's a review that is similar.http://www.cnet.com/news/pioneer-plx-1000-a-dj-turntable-an-audiophile-can-love/
I have owned a VPI HW-19 for 22 years now and there has never been a repair, just a single belt change becauuse I wanted to change it and have a spare belt. The Audioquest PT-6 tonearm has given similar service as well. Since it is domestic and parts are readily available, a used VPI turntable is an excellent choice. No electronics or other nonsense to go bad, like a Technics servo-controlled turntable I previously owned.