0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 7579 times.
If you had your choice between these two in an amp, which one would you choose and why?
I've had both in my Cronus Magnum (and had 6550s in a couple of amps before that). I prefer the 120s: they are more extended top and bottom, while retaining a full mid-range. They produce a larger soundstage and are more dynamic, if not quite as refined. They, IMO, are superior overall to current 6550s. NOS GE 6550s have a harmonic richness and three dimensionality of images that is unbelievably seductive, but they fall short of the 120s in the other areas above. And are now very expensive, if you can find them.If you don't need that much power, however, my favorite tube is the KT66. To me it has a more even frequency balance, and a greater purity of tone, transparency, coherency, and refinement than any of the other pentode/beam pentode/kinkless tetrode tubes. The Genalex KT66 reissue is superb.
JJ 6550 kicks Tug Sol KT120 butt in my Prima Luna Dialogue Premium Integrated. The KT120's sound no better than my solid state gear (which ain't bad stuff, but clearly worse than EL34, KT66, or KT77). Out of all the above tubes, the 6550 are my favorite. Note that except for the KT120's, all tubes are cryo'd.Note also that the amp has auto-biasing, which ends up negating most of differences between output tubes.
where do the kt 90's fit sound wise?