0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 5352 times.
This got me to thinking, surely tone controls cannot really add treble to what is being produced by the source recording... can it???
Yes, they actually boost or cut bass and treble.
So I engaged the tone controls with the bass at 12 o'clock and the treble at 3 o'clock. Now this sounded much nicer and more revealing in the treble region.
OK, boost or cut bass and treble. But they don't add bass and treble that's not already on the source recording, right? This is what I'm getting at, but I could be wrong. I'm still learning.I actually prefer hearing only the sound of the source recording which I can get by using a quality passive attenuator like a Goldpoint, Bent or an LDR.
Back in the day some tone controls were still altering the output from the amplifier even when they were in the 12 o'clock position. If you actually have a switch that takes the tone controls out of the signal path then you hear what you hear. It nice that you can get the sound you want by engaging the tone controls. I think there still may be a place in the system for tone controls,heretic that I am.Scotty
They give you distortion and a false sense of security that you are making it better. It's a lazy man's fix.
Opinionated much?.........with your lazy man's response to a useful discussion.Not having an anechoic chamber for a listening room has nothing to do with being lazy or insecure.
Distortion? Not inherently they don't.If a users objective is to achieve a flatter target (or maybe something else) then their usage can indeed make it better and not instill a false sense of security.Tone controls are simply equalization. It's a tool that properly used can improve (or not improve) a systems performance. Much is up to the user to figure out how to best utilize them.Distortion, false sense of security, lazy man's fix, is just silly rhetoric and incorrect.Dave.
It's easily proved. You can actually see the distortion on an oscilliscope.