Lost81,
It was probably my comments on Rikken Ohms you saw.
Their resistance has a voltage dependency. Since we are talking about voltage across a resistor its equally valid to say they have a current dependency.
That is their resistance = R(1 + k.V) where R is their nominal value, k is some constant and V is the voltage across the resistor, including the audio signal ie can be + or - .
This is a "first order" dependency (ie no squared terms etc.)
It can be shown mathematically (but I won't) that this introduces second harmonic distortion which as we all know is good for:
- "warming up" an amp
- gives a sense of stronger bass
- masks crappy stuff.
When I did my 55N Plus researches I used a Rikken Ohm for the feedback resistor (the 82K). The more improvements I made in terms of the capacitors etc. the less I liked the Rikken in the feedback path and eventually I deleted it. I did'nt try Rikkens anywhere else in the amp.
BUT
I still have a 27K Rikken feeding the shunt 22K pot as my volume control in my GK1.
AND
The old 82K Rikkens from the AKSA are now doing duty as the feedback resistors in my 4 x KT88 Ultralinear Valve Amp.
Horses for Courses:
From memory R3 is the diff amp bias resistor from the emitters to the +ve rail. If my memory is WRONG then the following is crap.
R3 has next to no AC signal across it just DC voltage so yes a Rikkens value will be shifted a bit BUT will not vary with the audio signal so no 2H introduced. I would say that its a bit pointless trying a Rikken here.
What you want for R3 is stability and low noise - stick to a metal film, these are better than Rikkens in both respects
Cheers,
Ginger