I think Neo's Dyna rec's are good advice for this review too. It starts off great with you talking through all the front/back panel features and bias instructions but then fizzles during the sonic review IMO. Sadly, there's no air time of the amp playing. Nor is there a frame of reference for the recordings you've used. If you're worried about licensing/copyrighting issues than at least mention a few specific recordings which really show off the amp and talk about why you chose those particular recordings. It would help if these recordings were fairly standard audiophile fare so we can know, and experience, the qualities you're talking about in the recordings themselves and have an idea about how the amp handles these qualities. I.E. 'in most systems, such-and-such recording gives me a wooly, untamed bass, especially in track X but the Rogue Cronus tackled this wooly beast with authority and blah blah blah.' If you thought about what a transcript of your video would read like you'll see that there is very little specific info about the sound/performance of this amp. A video review must still have good information in it.
I hope I'm not coming across too harsh. You've clearly got some on-screen pizzazz and flair. And you're aiming high and I can respect that. But I think if you want to be taken more seriously as a reviewer ( I think this is what you're shooting for) my comments and the comments in the Dyna review will help you quite a bit.
Stereophile may now be looking for a new hipster reviewer now that Meijias is leaving....