are ruby cantilevers any easier to break or snap off than other materials?

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 794 times.

nnck

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 256
  • Music Collector, Audiophile, in that order :)
Another simple question- just what the topis says:

Is a ruby cantilever any more likely to break or snap off than other common materials used to make them?

I know many will argue that ruby cantilevers will produce a better sound. I am not here to argue with that. But just want to know whether to take fragility into account when choosing my next cartridge. Everything else being equal, that is.

FullRangeMan

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 20894
  • To whom more was given more will be required.
    • Never go to a psychiatrist, adopt a straycat or dog. On the street they live only two years average.
I unknow the point response, but there is various interesting tips in this thread (Boron x Ruby Cantilever):
http://www.audiokarma.org/forums/showthread.php?t=512540
« Last Edit: 16 Mar 2014, 01:23 am by FULLRANGEMAN »

FullRangeMan

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 20894
  • To whom more was given more will be required.
    • Never go to a psychiatrist, adopt a straycat or dog. On the street they live only two years average.
double post

blakep


Is a ruby cantilever any more likely to break or snap off than other common materials used to make them?


Not in my experience. I've only had aluminum cantilevers for many years-had an MP11 Boron many, many moons ago.

Have been running with Soundsmith ruby cantilevers for about the past 4-5 years on 3 different cartridges and while they may appear visibly to be a bit more delicate than the aluminum cantilevers they've replaced they have not been in practice and have held up just fine.