0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic. Read 6532 times.
I just bought a Samsung 65" plasma. I returned it for an LED.
Bummer.I was hoping to hold off until next year. My older 720P model still looks great and works fine. Figured I'd replace it next year and move the old one into the basement, but I don't want to risk missing out.
+1. I still have a Pioneer Kuro in the spare setup, and while it still gets a great picture, the new Sony LED is a whole another level better. Ice Hockey is unbelievable, movies look better, just better all around.
There will be excess inventory available for even cheaper prices next year....So. I would not rush. The only issue with this announcement is that replacement or repair from now on will be difficult if not impossible. BUT, technology such as this is mean to be finite in lifespan.
Huh...... They must have changed something. Last time I looked, one of the main advantages of Plasma over LED/LCD was watching sports. The motion on LED/LCD has always looked very "jerky" to me. Much smoother on Plasma.
This is why, in my opinion, it is better to buy a smaller but higher end TV, than a larger lower end TV, where price is a concern.
Probably one the most difficult tests for motion artifacts is a rapid pan across a complete background landscape. A rapid 90degree pan across the landscape requires every pixel on the set to change color very quickly, usually at faster speed than the set can accommodate without artifacts. I have yet to see any LCD set regardless of the type of back-lighting used behind the LCDs do this without falling down. A modern CRT type display has no problems with this. The new HAWAII FIVE 0 series has frequent pans across the scenic landscape of Hawaii and almost every time this occurs I see motion artifacts on my Samsung UN55D6050 LCD set, regardless of my attempts to optimize its motion performance. The individual pixels response time just is not fast enough with currently applied technology. Loss of gray scale and contrast is also aggravating.Scotty