0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 7383 times.
That's an impressive review. Someone will definitely have to do a head to head with the TBI. The ability of the NAD to be used with any speaker regardless of impedance is a step above the TBI; I'm pretty sure the Millenia chip causes minor variations to speaker response based on impedance (anyone correct me if I'm wrong). Not to mention the NAD is designed (?) by Hypex whereas the TBI is really just an inexpensive TI chip meant for soundbars.Things are getting interesting!
The What HiFi review gives the nod to the Rotel RA-10 forsound quality. It give the NAD 3020 the nod for rhythmicdrive and dynamic subtlety. I'm not a big fan of What Hifi when it comes to review quality. Regardless one should listen to it with the ability to returnit if not satisfied. It definitely has a lot of connection options.
Yeah What Hifi has zero credibility in my book. Hopefully somebody gets a hold of one of these soon!
+1 in regard to What Hi-Fi's lack of credibility. Their review /rating system lacks contextual consistency. On top of this, I think it is idiotic how they will dock a former 5 star component's rating to 4 stars simply because newer components are available. It's ridiculous. To make my point I must ask : Is an original Shelby Cobra no longer great because Bugatti made the Veyron? I honestly think WHF exists to mess with the minds of the typical (perhaps British / European) consumer and keep people selling their old stuff and buying new stuff. I would only use WHF as general guide, then try and find in-depth reviews elsewhere.