0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 8578 times.
Hi,I was planning on get the CA Concept as this is my 1st turntable and the plug and play sounded more fitted for me. But I just noticed someone locally (France) is selling a used REGA PLANAR 9 MK1 with the RB900 arm.They are both the same price so I was wondering which one I was better off with? I see the R9 is discontinued so I could not find much on them but know Rega has a good reputation. Not that CelarAudio doesn't, just looking performance v price. Thanks
Thanks all,But don't you think 1500 euros for a 15yr old P9 with the older arm and no cart is a bit too much?
Budget is sub 2K. I don't have much vinyl to justify more then that.Difficult to say I would not be interesting in tweaking but I kinda doubt I will. Partly because I just don't understand it. I could learn but then again do I really want to open that can of worms money-wise.So guess that that leads me back to the CA huh?
I've just been through a similar process - I wanted to get back into vinyl after a long break from it, and was a little concerned over where I needed to pitch price-wise to have something of sufficient SQ to hopefully improve over CD, and therefore justify the investment.After looking at a LOT of TT's on the used markets, I finally opted for a Clearaudio. It isn't the Concept but it does have the Satisfy arm and is pretty much set and forget, once you have it dialed-in to your liking. I've underlined the last part because this was not a table that gave me what I was looking for out of the box. The TT setup sounded very lean and bright, with insufficient bottom end. I then spent time on forums discovering that the manufacturer recommended 'parallel' setting for VTA wasn't optimal for the Satisfy arm and that it should be lowered by a couple mm at the pivot side to improve bass. That worked. I then used the protractor that came with the TT to check the stylus overhang and found it to be off by 1/8" or more, so that needed adjustment as did the azimuth. I have a Sure Force gauge arriving in the mail this week to reset the VTF, which is needed after any of the other adjustments I made.But it plays a LOT better now.My point is - even with a basic TT with few adjustable parameters, you may still need to acquire some basic tools and a little knowledge to get it to integrate well with the rest of your system, and get it to fulfill it's SQ potential. So I think the key is finding a deck that stays in-tune once setup properly. Now I have my CA where I need it, I can't envisage having to tinker with it for a long time, which suits me fine. Whereas other types of decks, perhaps those with a sprung plinth/chassis design, may need some regular ongoing attention to stay at their best.Lastly, with the CA arm and deck, I didn't find adjusting it to be particularly difficult. Just some slow, methodical/careful steps conducted using the appropriate tools.But it's worth it. And yes, in your position I'd be more inclined to pick something more modern where parts and support are more readily available.RoozePS - I was a little confused as you say this will be your first TT but it appears you already have one?
I think I am going to take a step back and reanalyze how much I would have to conceivable spend on a TT to approach the sound of my digital. And then ask if it is really worth it.