0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 24181 times.
They're small enough to rig up a cat-proof barrier...
From the Magnestand site: "It can have mitered corners or traditional "square" butted joints. Same cost either way. However I recommend and only do the butt joined corners anymore because the sharp angles of the mitered ones can put the grain in opposition which has shown a tendency of the corners to open up in time as the wood shrinks. (they open in winter when the shrink rate is greatest, and tend to reclose in summer) Butt joints may suffer a slight unevenness at the top at some times in the year but should never get crack openings."
Interesting, considering his previous comments.Anyways, my butt-jointed frames have been working beautifully for well over three years now. But what do I know. Dave.
I knew Steve would beat me to the punch... This man has a veritable Magnepan museum - older MMGs, 1.7s upstairs and (in the same room as the MMGs) 20.7s! So for him to say that the Magnestand MMGs were impressive is truly saying something. Except for MMGs, the only other Magnepans I heard previously were MG-12's and 3.6's being Magnestanded (is that a word?) at Mr. Gunn's. Going into this, I thought that my Magnestand's might sound shouty trying to fill Steve's 50 foot long upstairs room. They didn't! They actually sounded really convincing, maybe 90-95% as effective as the 1.7's with only a slightly shorter soundstage. MGbert
FWIW, I have long offered to bring these back to the dealer where I bought the 1.6's initially for a demo - no interest whatsoever. At least Steve seems to be open to a comparison....
Marc - my offer still stands (no pun intended) for me to schlep my Gunned 1.6's up to Steve's for a listening session. It would be interesting (for me at least) to see how close they get to the 20.7's (with some subwoofer help). I'm pretty confident they would equal or beat any stock 3.x series Maggie. FWIW, I have long offered to bring these back to the dealer where I bought the 1.6's initially for a demo - no interest whatsoever. At least Steve seems to be open to a comparison....Jack
Sure, you can bring 1.6s by.I had a beat tube in my preamp downstairs so just ordered a "new" set. I thought things were sounding kind of funny, stupid things.I suspect that you'll find that for a given size room you'll need a larger speaker no matter what. When I tried putting the 1.7s downstairs they just sounded way too small in comparison to the 3.7s. You can also go too big which is what I've been struggling with. I don't want to go smaller, I want to get the house enlarged which is kind of crazy but that's what I'm going to end up doing.
Dave, have you ever given the thought of adding some sort of dampening material between your panels and wood frames, such as thin sheets of Sorbothane?I've flirted with the idea of taken the frames apart, re-routing in the space needed and adding some of this stuff on both sides of the panel:
But what do I know.
No, I haven't tried that. Conceptually, it defeats the purpose (one of the purposes) of the wood frames. However, some of the fellas have noted improvements from Razoring....which (I think) is a similar tactic.But what do I know. Dave.