What is the best amp for Magnepan's

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 37356 times.

josh358

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1227
Re: What is the best amp for Magnepan's
« Reply #40 on: 30 Jan 2013, 03:50 am »
Josh,

I understand, but it's confusing for folks when you mention an implied equivalence between SS amplifiers and tube amplifiers of half the power.  It's much more complicated than that.  :)

Soft-clipping is distortion.....regardless of how benevolent its audible effects.  That violates the "all other things being equal" proviso.

Cheers,

Dave.
Oops, didn't mean to confuse anybody. I was trying to give practical guidelines, hence "as a rule of thumb," my concerns being that a) it's hard to lug home amplifiers just to find through trial and error what size you need and b) big tube amps are expensive, so I'd tolerate some clipping, as long as it's inaudible -- whereas with solid state amps, I see no reason not to buy one big enough so that it will never play in its nonlinear range, even if someone is going Class A -- in my experience, a Class A amp that's stressed sounds a lot worse than an AB amp that isn't.

Davey

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1481
Re: What is the best amp for Magnepan's
« Reply #41 on: 30 Jan 2013, 03:54 am »
Then there is the fact that tubes reproduce all of the harmonics (in Triode), whereas SS doesn't.  It is amazing how more detail there is in Triode which I listen in about half of the time. 
Jim

That's just nonsense.  If there are harmonics in the source material then a SS amp will do just as good at reproducing them as a tube amp.  What a SS amp won't do is ADD a level of harmonics into the sound that a tube amp might.

There's nothing wrong with adding pleasing distortion, but it's not accuracy of reproduction.  I have nothing against an amplifier adding a pleasing quality to the sound reproduction, but let's not ever confuse that with accurately reproducing the signal presented at its input.

"Detail" is simply distortion hiding behind a subjective blanket that make it sound good.  :)

Even the key word in the title of this thread "best" is a subjective term.  :)  I don't think it's possible to even think about answering the original query of this thread unless we define what the power amplifier's job really is.  I don't think we'd even get consensus on that.  :)

Cheers,

Dave.



Elizabeth

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 2737
  • So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish
Re: What is the best amp for Magnepan's
« Reply #42 on: 30 Jan 2013, 03:58 am »
If i had way more money i too would have considered Pass Labs Amplifiers.
The ony issue i have with Pass is the heat output is very high.
Someone mentioned running four big Pass Amps 24/7 and discovered their electric bill went up $250. for  the month JUST for the amps. !!!

If common sense ruled I would buy the big Brystons 28B-SST2 instead of big Pass Labs IF I had any big money. (along with Magnepan 20.7s..)

medium jim

Re: What is the best amp for Magnepan's
« Reply #43 on: 30 Jan 2013, 03:59 am »
Josh:

My point is that if it is inaudible, it is a non-sequitur.  As you know, output tubes sound their best when saturated,  just before they start to compress the highs. With my system this happens right at 99 to 101db c weighted in fast mode which is very loud.  This equates to transient peaks near 110db. 

I listen typically at around 95db which is still very loud, well under the compressing point and still with plenty of headroom. 

60 watts of tube power from my old Jolida 502 crapped out on my 1.6's to the point where I would get panel slap and serious sibilance (overly compressed highs).  I can only surmise that the Jolida had a less than hearty power supply. 

In triode mode in my Marantz's, I have no problem driving the 2.5's into the low to mid 90's without ill effects, reason, beefy power supply.

It is not just about the wattage but about the total topology and ability to drive a 4 ohm or lower load. This is a fact no matter if the amp is SS or Tube. 

Jim

 

josh358

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1227
Re: What is the best amp for Magnepan's
« Reply #44 on: 30 Jan 2013, 04:21 am »
Josh:

My point is that if it is inaudible, it is a non-sequitur.  As you know, output tubes sound their best when saturated,  just before they start to compress the highs. With my system this happens right at 99 to 101db c weighted in fast mode which is very loud.  This equates to transient peaks near 110db. 

I listen typically at around 95db which is still very loud, well under the compressing point and still with plenty of headroom. 

60 watts of tube power from my old Jolida 502 crapped out on my 1.6's to the point where I would get panel slap and serious sibilance (overly compressed highs).  I can only surmise that the Jolida had a less than hearty power supply. 

In triode mode in my Marantz's, I have no problem driving the 2.5's into the low to mid 90's without ill effects, reason, beefy power supply.

It is not just about the wattage but about the total topology and ability to drive a 4 ohm or lower load. This is a fact no matter if the amp is SS or Tube. 

Jim
Sure, technically it isn't even solid state vs. tube, the difference here is that tube amps can only have so much NFB, hence their soft clipping characteristics.

And certainly with Maggies you have to be able to drive a 4 ohm load without frying the amp.

The power supply also matters, as you point out. An amp that doesn't recover quickly from clipping will sound worse when stressed. It's silly, but the weight of an amp can tell you something about how conservative the design is. It isn't unusual to find that two amps with the same published power specs will have very different performance because one has a hefty power supply, a big filter bank, and high current capability.

It isn't really possible with the specs that are available for the typical audiophile amp to know just how loud it will play before sounding distorted with actual program material. Hell, even if you could, nobody sets volume controls with perfect precision, room acoustics vary, etc. So when I figure the size of an amp, I allow some extra headroom. But if you're dealing with tubes where power is expensive, that may not be a suitable strategy. Then I think the thing to do is take some measurements, use those to get a ballpark figure, and then try it.

medium jim

Re: What is the best amp for Magnepan's
« Reply #45 on: 30 Jan 2013, 04:24 am »

That's just nonsense.  If there are harmonics in the source material then a SS amp will do just as good at reproducing them as a tube amp.  What a SS amp won't do is ADD a level of harmonics into the sound that a tube amp might.

There's nothing wrong with adding pleasing distortion, but it's not accuracy of reproduction.  I have nothing against an amplifier adding a pleasing quality to the sound reproduction, but let's not ever confuse that with accurately reproducing the signal presented at its input.

"Detail" is simply distortion hiding behind a subjective blanket that make it sound good.  :)

Even the key word in the title of this thread "best" is a subjective term.  :)  I don't think it's possible to even think about answering the original query of this thread unless we define what the power amplifier's job really is.  I don't think we'd even get consensus on that.  :)

Cheers,

Dave.
[/quote]

Davey:

It isn't about concensus, just the opposite.  I guess I love a little pleasant in my cup of java :beer:

Jim

medium jim

Re: What is the best amp for Magnepan's
« Reply #46 on: 30 Jan 2013, 04:38 am »
Sure, technically it isn't even solid state vs. tube, the difference here is that tube amps can only have so much NFB, hence their soft clipping characteristics.

And certainly with Maggies you have to be able to drive a 4 ohm load without frying the amp.

The power supply also matters, as you point out. An amp that doesn't recover quickly from clipping will sound worse when stressed. It's silly, but the weight of an amp can tell you something about how conservative the design is. It isn't unusual to find that two amps with the same published power specs will have very different performance because one has a hefty power supply, a big filter bank, and high current capability.

It isn't really possible with the specs that are available for the typical audiophile amp to know just how loud it will play before sounding distorted with actual program material. Hell, even if you could, nobody sets volume controls with perfect precision, room acoustics vary, etc. So when I figure the size of an amp, I allow some extra headroom. But if you're dealing with tubes where power is expensive, that may not be a suitable strategy. Then I think the thing to do is take some measurements, use those to get a ballpark figure, and then try it.

Exactly...Magnepan was very smart by the way they covered this issue on their FAQ.  A good amp design/topology is the key factor no matter if it is SS or Tube or when it was made.  To me Tubes sound more life like, maybe because they are organic and more linear in nature.  But that is my bias and I will have to live with it :eyebrows:

Having hit my Maggie's with mega watt SS and medium watt Tube, I find that they respond to both nicely and both will get it all out of them, it becomes a personal choice.  Better put, there is no best amp for Magnepan's, in fact many amps can be the best, so long as they have an ample power supply to handle a 4 ohm load and then have enough watts to drive them to the desired sound pressure for the room.
Jim
« Last Edit: 30 Jan 2013, 05:45 pm by medium jim »

oracle309

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 46
Re: What is the best amp for Magnepan's
« Reply #47 on: 30 Jan 2013, 08:54 pm »
From what I remember from a few friends that had them, anything capable of some current. Minimum were the Adcom amplifiers. Bryston, big HK integrated amps (like the PM665) and such.

Okay guys, I guess you folks did not understood my last post: "capable of producing some current". Obviously this is not a quality of sound consideration, but again I am/was assuming you folks would understand the relationship between power, current and the ability to drive a particular impedance.
I:= V/R
and P:= I²R, P:=V²/R
If the impedance drops to 1/2 of a given value for R (well actually Z if formally correct), and V is constant, P must go up if an ideal device. Implied is that if I increases, then R(Z) decreases for a given voltage.

Beyond the ability to drive some current (or the ability to effectively "deal" with an impedance 1/2 as much as a reference), sound quality is of importance. I really never liked the HK PM665, until a customer (20 or so years ago) insisted on a HK PM 665. Nicely built, and not cheap. It was a development due to Mati Otalla's ideas of high current current being a significant factor in amplifier quality.

That's it. Now got find an amp that can swing double the current into 1/2 the impedance with a sound you like.
« Last Edit: 31 Jan 2013, 12:56 am by oracle309 »

josh358

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1227
Re: What is the best amp for Magnepan's
« Reply #48 on: 30 Jan 2013, 09:12 pm »
Okay guys, I guess you folks did not understood my last post: "capable of producing some current". Obviously this is not a quality of sound consideration, but again I am/was assuming you folks would understand the relationship between power, current and the ability to drive a particular impedance.
I:= V/R
and P:= I²R, P:=V²/R
If the impedance drops to 1/2 of a given value for R (well actually Z if formally correct), and V is constant, P must go up if an ideal device. Implied is that if I increases, then R(Z) decreases for a given voltage.

Maybe I'm missing something, because I assume everyone here knows that.

oracle309

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 46
Re: What is the best amp for Magnepan's
« Reply #49 on: 31 Jan 2013, 12:12 am »
Maybe I'm missing something, because I assume everyone here knows that.

Well it seems as though the discussion was going the way of impedance rather than a discussion concerning current. A high current amp will be able to drive a lower impedance than a lower current capable amp, all else being equal. This is completely in agreement with Jim Winey and Magnepan. Unless I completely mis-read the responses or other posts, in which case please ignore my last post.

stew

josh358

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1227
Re: What is the best amp for Magnepan's
« Reply #50 on: 31 Jan 2013, 12:35 am »
Well it seems as though the discussion was going the way of impedance rather than a discussion concerning current. A high current amp will be able to drive a lower impedance than a lower current capable amp, all else being equal. This is completely in agreement with Jim Winey and Magnepan. Unless I completely mis-read the responses or other posts, in which case please ignore my last post.

stew
Absolutely true about current. I think the other issue that was being raised was that of an amp with high output impedance, and the effect it has on the frequency response of the speaker. So it was really a separate issue. The point I tried to make on that is that it will happen with all speakers, not just Maggies as one post seemed to imply. This I think bothers us engineers more than some audiophiles, who just choose whatever sounds good. :-)

SteveFord

  • Facilitator
  • Posts: 6464
  • The poodle bites, the poodle chews it.
Re: What is the best amp for Magnepan's
« Reply #51 on: 31 Jan 2013, 12:38 am »
I've got the answer:
The BEST amp is the one you can't afford.

josh358

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1227
Re: What is the best amp for Magnepan's
« Reply #52 on: 31 Jan 2013, 12:52 am »
I've got the answer:
The BEST amp is the one you can't afford.
That would be all of them . . .

oracle309

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 46
Re: What is the best amp for Magnepan's
« Reply #53 on: 31 Jan 2013, 01:14 am »
Me2 :cry:

I think one of the few things that can be done regarding the impedance of loudspeakers is the addition of a Zobel or similar device. A varying impedance cannot be eliminated, but it can be minimized. Now the problem with adding any device between the amplifier and loudspeaker (or in parallel as need be) is the relative inefficiency of these devices and the power requirements to voltage drop across these devices.

Why can't we have our cake and eat it too?

SteveFord

  • Facilitator
  • Posts: 6464
  • The poodle bites, the poodle chews it.
Re: What is the best amp for Magnepan's
« Reply #54 on: 31 Jan 2013, 01:17 am »
Where IS that winning lottery ticket? 
A pair of VTL Seigfrieds would really fit the bill nicely, I would think.
You could do worse.

josh358

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1227
Re: What is the best amp for Magnepan's
« Reply #55 on: 31 Jan 2013, 01:21 am »
Me2 :cry:

I think one of the few things that can be done regarding the impedance of loudspeakers is the addition of a Zobel or similar device. A varying impedance cannot be eliminated, but it can be minimized. Now the problem with adding any device between the amplifier and loudspeaker (or in parallel as need be) is the relative inefficiency of these devices and the power requirements to voltage drop across these devices.

Why can't we have our cake and eat it too?
Not to mention that you'd have to come up with a custom Zoebel. Didn't Hafler make a tunable amp at some point?

Me, I'm content to use an amp with a reasonable damping factor.

Davey

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1481
Re: What is the best amp for Magnepan's
« Reply #56 on: 31 Jan 2013, 02:03 am »
Even a Zobel won't level the impedance of a speaker if the electrical crossover is asymmetric (as most are) to achieve the proper acoustic slopes.  You would need a conjugate network (RLC wired in series, shunted across the speaker input) tuned for each impedance peak(s) to appreciably level the impedance of a speaker like that.

However, it doesn't matter much since most amplifiers function as voltage sources (very low output impedance) and will provide the necessary current regardless of the impedance swings.
These speaker impedance swings are really only of interest when power amplifier output impedance becomes significant.

The obvious solution is to remove the crossover components between amplifier and transducer(s).  :)

There is, of course, the dynamic current capability of the amplifier......but that is another subject.

Cheers,

Dave.

*Scotty*

Re: What is the best amp for Magnepan's
« Reply #57 on: 31 Jan 2013, 03:12 am »
Here are a couple of phase/impedance graphs courtesy of Stereophile.
The first one is the 1.6R

Magnepan MG1.6/QR, electrical impedance (solid) and phase (dashed) (2 ohms/vertical div.).
The second one is the 3.6R

Magnepan MG3.6/R, electrical impedance (solid) and phase (dashed). (2 ohms/vertical div.)
 I guess I'm just not seeing the problem with driving these kinds of loads.
The speakers are relatively insensitive at a Stereophile guesstimated 83dB/1watt/meter. Magnepan sensitivity measurement reflects the 4ohm nature of the speaker in that when fed 2.83 volts twice the current will be drawn from the amplifier which results in an 86dB sensitivity rating.
 That being said I still don't see them as a power hog. 10watts in gives 93dB@1 meter, 100watts is 103dB @ 1meter. In as much as they are line sources they don't fall down with distance the way a point source does.
Scotty
 

josh358

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1227
Re: What is the best amp for Magnepan's
« Reply #58 on: 31 Jan 2013, 03:27 am »
I guess I'm just not seeing the problem with driving these kinds of loads.
The speakers are relatively insensitive at a Stereophile guesstimated 83dB/1watt/meter. Magnepan sensitivity measurement reflects the 4ohm nature of the speaker in that when fed 2.83 volts twice the current will be drawn from the amplifier which results in an 86dB sensitivity rating.
 That being said I still don't see them as a power hog. 10watts in gives 93dB@1 meter, 100watts is 103dB @ 1meter. In as much as they are line sources they don't fall down with distance the way a point source does.
Scotty
No, they're easy loads (though I agree with Davey -- the best approach with any speaker is to put the crossover ahead of the amps). The speakers are on the inefficient side, though. You do gain a bit from the 1/R radiation pattern of the full height ones but you also lose room gain because of dipole cancellation. Per your figures, you'll need a 100 watt amp to listen at moderate levels, a big one to listen at realistic ones, e.g., a minimum of 115 dB peaks (which most audiophiles don't, so no bother for most). So that's what some people complain about. Really, it isn't a problem if you're cool with solid state, since big, economical, high quality solid state amps are available. But people who want to use SET amps will find little joy.

Wendell points out BTW that it would cost more to increase efficiency by using neodynium magnets than it does to get a bigger amp if you need high levels.

It's easy to see though how the misapprehension that Maggies don't play loud occurs, if you go to a dealer and turn it up to see what it will do and the dealer has a 100 or 200 watt amp on it well it will peter out. The same audiophile might be happy with a 200 watt amp at home, since he doesn't normally listen at those levels.




medium jim

Re: What is the best amp for Magnepan's
« Reply #59 on: 31 Jan 2013, 03:34 am »
No, they're easy loads (though I agree with Davey -- the best approach with any speaker is to put the crossover ahead of the amps). The speakers are on the inefficient side, though. You do gain a bit from the 1/R radiation pattern of the full height ones but you also lose room gain because of dipole cancellation. Per your figures, you'll need a 100 watt amp to listen at moderate levels, a big one to listen at realistic ones, e.g., a minimum of 115 dB peaks (which most audiophiles don't, so no bother for most). So that's what some people complain about. Really, it isn't a problem if you're cool with solid state, since big, economical, high quality solid state amps are available. But people who want to use SET amps will find little joy.

Wendell points out BTW that it would cost more to increase efficiency by using neodynium magnets than it does to get a bigger amp if you need high levels.

It's easy to see though how the misapprehension that Maggies don't play loud occurs, if you go to a dealer and turn it up to see what it will do and the dealer has a 100 or 200 watt amp on it well it will peter out. The same audiophile might be happy with a 200 watt amp at home, since he doesn't normally listen at those levels.

115db is ear splitting and will cause you to go deaf....

I concur with Scotty on this one....

One disadvantage of tubes is that no matter how you hook them up, they will only be the rate wattage, i.e., will be the same wattage at 4ohm as they are at 8...

Jim