. . and Danny, for twenty large (or ten-ish on the super-limited-intro-niceguy-special pricing), no love for the no-rez on the servos?
The lower section will be lined with No Rez. It is just not in there yet.
Narrower baffle not better than wider baffle? Can you explain? I will look for that post where you said it makes no difference to see if you explained why.
Oh, you mean the whole baffle being narrow. In this case the lower baffle is already as narrow as it can be to accommodate the lower woofers.
There is a catch 22 in there on the baffle width. Narrow is better in that it minimizes the surface reflections and improves imaging. However, there needs to be a wide enough baffle to separate the front and back waves enough to push the dipole peak into a range where the low end response of the driver starts to fall away. In this case a 13" wide baffle with a 2.5" to 5" side wing making a very shallow U shape did the trick. Some of this work was refines on the Super-V.
The baffles effects on the tweeter have been greatly minimized with a small wave guide. Otherwise it would have a real negative effect on the highs.