0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 5874 times.
SB Touch certainly will work, but you are better off connecting the portable USB drive to your computer, rather than the Touch, and run the Squeezebox Server app on your computer. This way, not only can you easily back up your music, the Touch will be way more responsive, and yes -- you can download a free app to your iPod or iPad and wirelessly control the SqueezeBox over your WIFI network. Not all USB drives work (or work well) with the Touch.I don't know if there is a Touch remote-control app for the Kindle.My config is a 1 TB USB drive on an old Windows XP computer, computer is hard-wired ethernet (but it does work wireless as well if you have a good wireless network and no local interference), the Squeezebox sits in my equipment rack, connected via the coax output to my DAC, gets the music stream over WIFI from the computer, and I sit in the easy chair with an iPad and control the whole thing.
I don't know if there is a list, per se. Someone will eventually chime in here who does, though. Thing is, the SB Touch needs (works better, perhaps?) an outboard drive that operates in NAS mode. If you do a google on squeezebox touch disk drives you'll get a number of posts with various issues, suggestions, etc.
The biggest issue for me would be the poor performance often reported, along with having to move the drive to the computer for backups and updates. I also use the same drive for other media including my Lightroom files.
I have no problems with streaming over Wifi -- the only reason I wired my computer is that it's on the far diagonal of the house opposite the router, and was subject to a lot of local interference. The SB is closer to the router, and never has a problem
There are remote control capabilities in Foobar2000. Look at the other components listed on the Foobar2000 website and you will find ones for both running a web based application and Android remote via an app. You can control Foobar2000 from anywhere in your WiFi setup with either capability. I find the web page interface from IE9 works well and has more capability than the Android app.
Here is the link to the website. It has been taken off the Foobar2000 page.https://code.google.com/p/foo-httpcontrol/
Warning: this software hasn't been updated for a long time and most likely won't be updated in the future - proceed with care
[snip]Is there another product that might work the way I want? Perhaps a small quiet computer (sans keyboard and screen?) than I can put in my equipment rack with a USB drive attached to it that I can control via WiFi?Thanks again and keep the great info/suggestions comming.
Thanks.Yikes, this warning isn't very reassuring;
take a look here:http://www.soundstagehifi.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=430:wyred-4-sound-ms-1-music-server-&catid=55:full-length-reviews&Itemid=4and here:http://www.soundstagehifi.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=215:auraliti-pk100-music-server&catid=55:full-length-reviews&Itemid=4both are small, quiet, and can be remote controlled.later,todd
It has been very stable on Foobar2000, even with the latest update.
If you want cheap buy a Raspberry Pi. I am not sure how one remotely controls a Linux machine but I think it is easily done.http://www.raspberrypi.org/faqsWhile not as cheap you should be able to use a laptop and Windows Remote Desktop or a screen sharing program like Teamviewer.
If you want cheap buy a Raspberry Pi. I am not sure how one remotely controls a Linux machine but I think it is easily done.http://www.raspberrypi.org/faqs