Hey Jack,
I realize you're being somewhat facetious, but yup, I think you've got it about right.

Analytically, for many reasons, most of them quite objective, I prefer the Ncores as a tool for the evaluation of cables. Its what I do, and for me, it makes changes to cables quite easily discernible. After a couple of weeks with the Ncores, I came to the conclusion that I would be selling my Aksa. Now, 2 months in, I'm not sure. Given my experience with my specific implementation of the Ncore 400s, save for bass, I still prefer that physical/emotional connection I get from my Aksa Lifeforce. It simply makes me want to dance. Thankfully, at my age, the dancing is in my shoes. So, I'm finally going to change the input cabling on the Aksa (talk about the shoemaker's children

) and muck about to see if I can improve upon some characteristics highlighted from my time with the Ncores, while hopefully keeping that emotional connection.
Do I care that my libertine self prefers the more distorted sound? No, not as long as I don't perceive that distortion as such. When folks describe the Lightspeed LDR attenuator's [ or my tubed EAR Acute III cd player/dac ] sound as transparent, resolving, cohesive, detailed, etc... I know that this is a valid subjective perception that doesn't correlate all that well with those metrics that one would typically associate with those adjectives, objectively. Even those more sophisticated LDR implementations from Constellation and DartZeel, would have lower distortion if they simply used switched resistors. Yup, I know were not measuring the right things..... whatever.
That was the long answer, short answer, yes.
FWIW, YMMV,
Paul
EDIT: What I'd really like to try, but couldn't for many reasons, is swap out the Ncore 400's discrete instrumentation amps inputs for one using monolithic OPA2107s op amps.