0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 26625 times.
Yes, I know the crossovers are harder to implement correctly in a 3-way, but from what I've read, Rick at Selah knows what he's doing. I've seen comments from him regarding his 2-way vs 3-way and he states that if implemented correctly, it allows the drivers to operate in their designed range and can make for a smoother sound. I'm sure both are excellent speakers, without a direct comparison (wasn't someone here or another forum getting both?), I don't think it's fair to say one is better than the other. The cabinet in the Vapor obviously involves much more time and expense, but does it really make that much difference?
...If three ways were simply better, we'd be using many more drivers than that. In an ideal system, the main speakers would be cut off above 50 hz to properly integrate the bass. The need for the third driver goes away in such a system, for the most part.
that's because such a system, w/active subwoofers, IS a 3-way system. doug s.
Crossing over to multiple subs doesn't necessarily have drawbacks to it, but blending drivers together in a more sensitive frequency range does.
2 ways always have ugly @ss stands. Might as well get a 3 way that's actually veneered and finished from top to bottom. I friggin hate the crappy looking black metal stands most 2 ways have to sit on.
I thought my 2 way speakers have nice looking stands.
Those Vapor stands are as nice looking as it gets. The speakers are really nice looking as well. I would encourage the OP to listen to as many speakers as possible before making a decision. VMPS is often overlooked because they are not the flavor of the month, but the RM30's are very good sounding and I still think they look cool. If you are going to shell out this kind of cash, try to find people near you who are willing to let you hear their speakers. I'm a fan of monitors and active subs but they can take a bit of work to dial in. My subs use a basic Behringer DCX2496 and, after a session with Phil Bamberg and an Omni-mic (from partsexpress), he dialed in the bass flat to 20hz. The bass output is amazing and blends perfectly with the monitors. After owning this type of system, I could not go back to passive 3 way speakers. It took about fifteen minutes to dial in the woofers using the Omni-Mic.
The most obvious choice is a second Vandy 2W sub and monitors. But stands are always an issue (even with large monitor types like the big Harbeths). It almost begs the question, if you like the old Vandersteens, why not upgrade to the improved Model 3A? You may also consider (if looking for a non-typical "monitor" style recommend) Fritz Loudspeakers. Many models have been well reviewed and most are under USD$2k . Then add another sub I personally like floor-standers because the need for good (and usually expensive) stands can move you up into a more full-range speaker that does credible bass on their own and only need a little augmentation. Consider jackman's comments on an outboard crossover, just spend some money upgrading the DCX2496 (if this system is also used for listening. If you have a primary 2 channel setup, please disregard. I'd love to have your issue. Perhaps donate the Vandersteen 2's to a needy audiophile (local). I'm sure the recipient would love them.
I guess I'm just looking for something different than the Vandys. I like them, but I think 25 years is enough. I'll probably hold on to them until my kids (17,21) are ready to move into a real apartment or house (not while in college).
I think there is a guy on the Audiogon forums that just took delivery of some new Cirrus. It certainly upheld my confidence in what Ryan does. I think I will probably be placing my order soon for the Cirrus. Just a few more pay checks and nice dinners for the wifey.And those big black speakers above? Are those TAD clones or something of the like?